Files
hakorune/socketbox_state_separation_issue.md
Moe Charm 56ce5da24d feat(issue): create Issue #80 for SocketBox state separation problem
🚨 Issue #80 - SocketBox State Separation Problem
- Method call clone state loss: bind()で状態設定後、isServer()で異なるCloneを参照し状態失われる
- 根本原因特定済み: メソッド呼び出しごとにSocket IDが変化(17→26→36→51)
- 状態逆流機構の不全: 新Clone内の状態変更が元変数に反映されない

📊 完全再現環境提供:
- test_socket_state_preservation.nyash: 基本的な状態保持失敗再現
- test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash: 包括的メソッドテスト
- test_other_boxes_working.nyash: 他Box正常動作確認

🔧 Copilot要求事項:
- 根本原因分析: Clone状態同期メカニズムの修正
- 全バグ報告: 些細な問題も含め全発見事項を報告
- 完全検証: 全テストケース通過必須
- Phase 9 HTTPサーバー実装の阻害要因解決

🎯 優先度: HIGH - HTTPサーバー機能に直接影響する状態管理問題

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-08-14 21:39:45 +09:00

7.3 KiB

🚨 Issue: SocketBox State Separation Problem - Method Call Clone State Loss

Priority: 🔥 HIGH - Critical for HTTP Server functionality
Impact: Phase 9 HTTP server implementation blocked by state management failure
Status: Ready for immediate investigation

📋 Problem Summary

SocketBox state changes are lost between method calls due to improper clone state synchronization. Each method call creates a new clone instance, causing state mutations to be isolated and not reflected back to the original variable.

Core Issue: bind() successfully sets isServer = true on Socket ID=36, but subsequent isServer() call creates Socket ID=51 clone and reads false.

🎯 Root Cause Analysis Completed

Confirmed Working Components

  • SocketBox creation: new SocketBox()
  • Method execution: All methods (bind, toString, isServer, close) execute without deadlock
  • Arc reference sharing: Proper Arc sharing within single method

Identified Core Problem

# Evidence from execution logs:
toString(): Socket ID = 17, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e300
isServer(): Socket ID = 26, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e600  # Different Arc!
bind():     Socket ID = 36, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e600  # State change applied here
isServer(): Socket ID = 51, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e600  # New clone, state lost

Problem Pattern: Method call resolution creates new clones without proper state back-propagation to original variable.

🧪 Complete Reproduction Test Cases

Test 1: State Persistence Failure

# Command
./target/release/nyash test_socket_state_preservation.nyash

# Current Result (BROKEN):
[Console LOG] Before bind: isServer = false
[Console LOG] Bind result = true  
[Console LOG] After bind: isServer = false  # ❌ Should be true
Result: FAIL: State preservation broken

# Expected Result (FIXED):
[Console LOG] After bind: isServer = true   # ✅ State preserved
Result: PASS: State preservation works

Test 2: Clone ID Analysis

# Command  
./target/release/nyash test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash

# Current Evidence:
🔥 SOCKETBOX DEBUG: bind() called - Socket ID = 36
🔥 AFTER MUTATION: is_server value = true    # ✅ State set correctly
🔥 SOCKETBOX DEBUG: isServer() called - Socket ID = 51  # ❌ Different ID!
🔥 IS_SERVER READ: is_server value = false  # ❌ Reading wrong instance

Test 3: Other Boxes Comparison

# Command
./target/release/nyash test_other_boxes_working.nyash

# Result: All other Box types work correctly
[Console LOG] ✅ ArrayBox正常: size=1
[Console LOG] ✅ MapBox正常: value=test_value  
[Console LOG] 🎉 他のBox全て正常動作: 4件成功

🔍 Technical Analysis Required

Primary Hypothesis

The issue lies in the clone state synchronization mechanism during method resolution:

// Problem area (suspected):
// Method resolution creates new clones but doesn't sync state back
if let Some(socket_box) = obj_value.as_any().downcast_ref::<SocketBox>() {
    let result = self.execute_socket_method(socket_box, method, arguments)?;
    // State changes in socket_box clone not propagated back to original
}

Investigation Focus Areas

  1. Clone Back-propagation: How method results update original variables
  2. Arc Reference Management: State container sharing vs instance isolation
  3. SocketBox vs Other Boxes: Why other Box types maintain state correctly
  4. Method Resolution Pipeline: Clone creation and state synchronization timing

Architecture Comparison

// Working Boxes (maintain state):
ArrayBox.push()  state change   reflects in original variable
MapBox.set()     state change   reflects in original variable

// Broken Box (loses state):  
SocketBox.bind()  state change   lost in clone, not in original

📊 Required Investigation Approach

NO Band-aid Fixes Allowed

  • NO symptom-only patches
  • NO guesswork solutions without root cause analysis
  • NO incomplete testing - all test cases must pass

Systematic Analysis Required

  1. Method Resolution Analysis: How clones are created and managed during method calls
  2. State Sync Architecture: Mechanism for propagating clone changes back to variables
  3. Comparative Study: Why ArrayBox/MapBox work but SocketBox doesn't
  4. Arc Pattern: Proper state container sharing implementation

Success Criteria - All Must Pass

Must Achieve

# Basic state preservation
local socket = new SocketBox()
local result = socket.bind("127.0.0.1", 8080)
local isServer = socket.isServer()  
# isServer.equals(true) == true  ✅

# Field-based state preservation  
me.server = new SocketBox()
me.server.bind("127.0.0.1", 8080)
local status = me.server.isServer()
# status.equals(true) == true  ✅

# Multiple method calls maintain state
socket.bind("127.0.0.1", 8080)    # Set state
socket.toString()                  # Access state  
socket.isServer()                  # Must still return true ✅

Validation Required

# All existing tests must pass
./target/release/nyash test_socket_state_preservation.nyash  
# Expected: PASS: State preservation works

./target/release/nyash test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash
# Expected: isServer() after bind returns true

./target/release/nyash test_other_boxes_working.nyash
# Expected: Continue working (regression check)

🧪 Test Files Provided

All reproduction test files are ready for execution:

  • test_socket_state_preservation.nyash - Primary reproduction case
  • test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash - Comprehensive method testing
  • test_other_boxes_working.nyash - Regression verification

🎯 Implementation Requirements

Architecture Consistency

  • Solution must align with "Everything is Box" philosophy
  • Maintain Rust safety guarantees
  • Preserve existing performance characteristics
  • No breaking changes to other Box types

Quality Standards

  • Root cause fix: Address clone state synchronization mechanism
  • Complete validation: All test scenarios must work
  • Performance impact: No degradation to method call performance
  • Memory safety: Maintain Arc safety model

📝 Reporting Requirements

Complete Issue Communication

  • Report ALL findings: Every discovered issue, even minor ones, must be reported
  • NO silent fixes: Do not fix issues without explicitly documenting them
  • Progressive updates: Provide regular progress updates during investigation
  • Detailed analysis: Include technical reasoning for all changes made

Forbidden Behaviors

  • Silent bug fixes: Fixing issues without reporting them
  • Assumption-based changes: Making changes without explaining reasoning
  • Incomplete reporting: Only mentioning major issues while hiding minor ones
  • Black box development: Working without progress communication

🚨 This issue blocks Phase 9 HTTP server implementation. SocketBox state management is critical for server functionality (bind → listen → accept flow). Immediate resolution required.

📋 Critical: Report every bug found, no matter how small. Communication and transparency are essential for this complex state management fix.