🚨 Issue #80 - SocketBox State Separation Problem - Method call clone state loss: bind()で状態設定後、isServer()で異なるCloneを参照し状態失われる - 根本原因特定済み: メソッド呼び出しごとにSocket IDが変化(17→26→36→51) - 状態逆流機構の不全: 新Clone内の状態変更が元変数に反映されない 📊 完全再現環境提供: - test_socket_state_preservation.nyash: 基本的な状態保持失敗再現 - test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash: 包括的メソッドテスト - test_other_boxes_working.nyash: 他Box正常動作確認 🔧 Copilot要求事項: - 根本原因分析: Clone状態同期メカニズムの修正 - 全バグ報告: 些細な問題も含め全発見事項を報告 - 完全検証: 全テストケース通過必須 - Phase 9 HTTPサーバー実装の阻害要因解決 🎯 優先度: HIGH - HTTPサーバー機能に直接影響する状態管理問題 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.3 KiB
🚨 Issue: SocketBox State Separation Problem - Method Call Clone State Loss
Priority: 🔥 HIGH - Critical for HTTP Server functionality
Impact: Phase 9 HTTP server implementation blocked by state management failure
Status: Ready for immediate investigation
📋 Problem Summary
SocketBox state changes are lost between method calls due to improper clone state synchronization. Each method call creates a new clone instance, causing state mutations to be isolated and not reflected back to the original variable.
Core Issue: bind() successfully sets isServer = true on Socket ID=36, but subsequent isServer() call creates Socket ID=51 clone and reads false.
🎯 Root Cause Analysis Completed
✅ Confirmed Working Components
- SocketBox creation:
new SocketBox()✅ - Method execution: All methods (bind, toString, isServer, close) execute without deadlock ✅
- Arc reference sharing: Proper Arc sharing within single method ✅
❌ Identified Core Problem
# Evidence from execution logs:
toString(): Socket ID = 17, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e300
isServer(): Socket ID = 26, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e600 # Different Arc!
bind(): Socket ID = 36, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e600 # State change applied here
isServer(): Socket ID = 51, Arc ptr = 0x560a2455e600 # New clone, state lost
Problem Pattern: Method call resolution creates new clones without proper state back-propagation to original variable.
🧪 Complete Reproduction Test Cases
Test 1: State Persistence Failure
# Command
./target/release/nyash test_socket_state_preservation.nyash
# Current Result (BROKEN):
[Console LOG] Before bind: isServer = false
[Console LOG] Bind result = true
[Console LOG] After bind: isServer = false # ❌ Should be true
Result: FAIL: State preservation broken
# Expected Result (FIXED):
[Console LOG] After bind: isServer = true # ✅ State preserved
Result: PASS: State preservation works
Test 2: Clone ID Analysis
# Command
./target/release/nyash test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash
# Current Evidence:
🔥 SOCKETBOX DEBUG: bind() called - Socket ID = 36
🔥 AFTER MUTATION: is_server value = true # ✅ State set correctly
🔥 SOCKETBOX DEBUG: isServer() called - Socket ID = 51 # ❌ Different ID!
🔥 IS_SERVER READ: is_server value = false # ❌ Reading wrong instance
Test 3: Other Boxes Comparison
# Command
./target/release/nyash test_other_boxes_working.nyash
# Result: All other Box types work correctly
[Console LOG] ✅ ArrayBox正常: size=1
[Console LOG] ✅ MapBox正常: value=test_value
[Console LOG] 🎉 他のBox全て正常動作: 4件成功
🔍 Technical Analysis Required
Primary Hypothesis
The issue lies in the clone state synchronization mechanism during method resolution:
// Problem area (suspected):
// Method resolution creates new clones but doesn't sync state back
if let Some(socket_box) = obj_value.as_any().downcast_ref::<SocketBox>() {
let result = self.execute_socket_method(socket_box, method, arguments)?;
// State changes in socket_box clone not propagated back to original
}
Investigation Focus Areas
- Clone Back-propagation: How method results update original variables
- Arc Reference Management: State container sharing vs instance isolation
- SocketBox vs Other Boxes: Why other Box types maintain state correctly
- Method Resolution Pipeline: Clone creation and state synchronization timing
Architecture Comparison
// Working Boxes (maintain state):
ArrayBox.push() → state change → ✅ reflects in original variable
MapBox.set() → state change → ✅ reflects in original variable
// Broken Box (loses state):
SocketBox.bind() → state change → ❌ lost in clone, not in original
📊 Required Investigation Approach
NO Band-aid Fixes Allowed
- NO symptom-only patches
- NO guesswork solutions without root cause analysis
- NO incomplete testing - all test cases must pass
Systematic Analysis Required
- Method Resolution Analysis: How clones are created and managed during method calls
- State Sync Architecture: Mechanism for propagating clone changes back to variables
- Comparative Study: Why ArrayBox/MapBox work but SocketBox doesn't
- Arc Pattern: Proper state container sharing implementation
✅ Success Criteria - All Must Pass
Must Achieve
# Basic state preservation
local socket = new SocketBox()
local result = socket.bind("127.0.0.1", 8080)
local isServer = socket.isServer()
# isServer.equals(true) == true ✅
# Field-based state preservation
me.server = new SocketBox()
me.server.bind("127.0.0.1", 8080)
local status = me.server.isServer()
# status.equals(true) == true ✅
# Multiple method calls maintain state
socket.bind("127.0.0.1", 8080) # Set state
socket.toString() # Access state
socket.isServer() # Must still return true ✅
Validation Required
# All existing tests must pass
./target/release/nyash test_socket_state_preservation.nyash
# Expected: PASS: State preservation works
./target/release/nyash test_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash
# Expected: isServer() after bind returns true
./target/release/nyash test_other_boxes_working.nyash
# Expected: Continue working (regression check)
🧪 Test Files Provided
All reproduction test files are ready for execution:
test_socket_state_preservation.nyash- Primary reproduction casetest_socketbox_fix_validation.nyash- Comprehensive method testingtest_other_boxes_working.nyash- Regression verification
🎯 Implementation Requirements
Architecture Consistency
- Solution must align with "Everything is Box" philosophy ✅
- Maintain Rust safety guarantees ✅
- Preserve existing performance characteristics ✅
- No breaking changes to other Box types ✅
Quality Standards
- Root cause fix: Address clone state synchronization mechanism
- Complete validation: All test scenarios must work
- Performance impact: No degradation to method call performance
- Memory safety: Maintain Arc safety model
📝 Reporting Requirements
Complete Issue Communication
- Report ALL findings: Every discovered issue, even minor ones, must be reported
- NO silent fixes: Do not fix issues without explicitly documenting them
- Progressive updates: Provide regular progress updates during investigation
- Detailed analysis: Include technical reasoning for all changes made
Forbidden Behaviors
- ❌ Silent bug fixes: Fixing issues without reporting them
- ❌ Assumption-based changes: Making changes without explaining reasoning
- ❌ Incomplete reporting: Only mentioning major issues while hiding minor ones
- ❌ Black box development: Working without progress communication
🚨 This issue blocks Phase 9 HTTP server implementation. SocketBox state management is critical for server functionality (bind → listen → accept flow). Immediate resolution required.
📋 Critical: Report every bug found, no matter how small. Communication and transparency are essential for this complex state management fix.