Update documentation to reflect Phase 201 (JoinValueSpace) and Phase 202 (Pattern 1-4 unification) achievements. Changes: 1. joinir-architecture-overview.md: - Add Section 1.9 "ValueId Space Management (Phase 201)" - ValueId space diagram (PHI/Param/Local regions) - Component-to-region mapping table - Design principles and value_id_ranges.rs relationship 2. CURRENT_TASK.md: - Add Phase 201 completion report (JoinValueSpace design + implementation) - Add Phase 202 completion report (Pattern 1-4 unified migration) - Add Phase 203-A completion report (dead code removal) - Include commit hashes, test results, and next steps 3. phase202-summary.md (NEW): - Complete Phase 202 summary document - Before/After comparison tables - Region usage matrix for all patterns - Test coverage (821 tests passing) - Architecture impact and benefits Documentation Coverage: - Phase 201: JoinValueSpace unified ValueId allocation - Phase 202-A: Pattern 1 migration (commit6e778948) - Phase 202-B: Pattern 3 migration (commit98e81b26) - Phase 202-C: Pattern 4 migration (commitae741d97) - Phase 203-A: Dead code removal (commitde9fe3bf) All documentation links verified and consistent. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.4 KiB
Phase 202: Pattern 1-4 JoinValueSpace Unification
Status: ✅ Complete Date: 2025-12-09 Commits:
6e778948Phase 202-A (Pattern 1)98e81b26Phase 202-B (Pattern 3)ae741d97Phase 202-C (Pattern 4)
Overview
Phase 202 unified all JoinIR loop patterns (Pattern 1-4) to use the JoinValueSpace system introduced in Phase 201, eliminating manual ValueId allocation counters and ensuring complete ValueId collision safety through region separation.
Motivation
Phase 201 successfully migrated Pattern 2 to JoinValueSpace, revealing the benefits of unified ValueId allocation:
- Safety: Disjoint regions (PHI/Param/Local) prevent collisions
- Consistency: Single allocation mechanism across all patterns
- Maintainability: No manual counter management
- Debuggability: Clear region boundaries (100, 1000)
Phase 202 extended this to the remaining patterns (1, 3, 4) to achieve complete architectural consistency.
Implementation Summary
Phase 202-A: Pattern 1 (Simple While)
File Changes:
simple_while_minimal.rs: Replacevalue_counterwithJoinValueSpacepattern1_minimal.rs: Create and passJoinValueSpaceto lowererloop_view_builder.rs: CreateJoinValueSpacein router
ValueId Usage:
| Region | Usage |
|---|---|
| PHI Reserved (0-99) | ❌ Not used |
| Param (100-999) | ❌ Not used (no ConditionEnv) |
| Local (1000+) | ✅ All temps (Const, Compare, UnaryOp) |
Why Pattern 1 is simpler: No break conditions → No ConditionEnv → No Param region needed
Test Results:
$ cargo test --release --lib pattern
✅ 119 passed
$ ./target/release/hakorune apps/tests/loop_min_while.hako
✅ Output: "0 1 2"
Phase 202-B: Pattern 3 (If-Else PHI)
File Changes:
loop_with_if_phi_minimal.rs: Replacevalue_counterwithJoinValueSpacepattern3_with_if_phi.rs: Create and passJoinValueSpaceto lowererloop_patterns/with_if_phi.rs: Update legacy wrapper
ValueId Usage:
| Region | Usage |
|---|---|
| PHI Reserved (0-99) | ❌ Not used |
| Param (100-999) | ❌ Not used (PHI values from ConditionEnv) |
| Local (1000+) | ✅ All temps (PHI, Select, BinOp) |
Test Results:
$ cargo test --release --lib if_phi
✅ 5/5 passed
$ ./target/release/hakorune apps/tests/loop_if_phi.hako
✅ Output: "9" (sum)
$ ./target/release/hakorune apps/tests/loop_if_phi_continue.hako
✅ Output: "9" (sum with continue)
Phase 202-C: Pattern 4 (Continue)
File Changes:
loop_with_continue_minimal.rs: Replace dual counters withJoinValueSpacepattern4_with_continue.rs: Create and passJoinValueSpaceto lowerer
Dual Counter Problem (Before):
// Two separate counters - collision risk!
let mut value_counter = 0u32;
let mut join_value_counter = 0u32; // Manually incremented
Unified Allocation (After):
// Single source of truth - no collision possible
let mut join_value_space = JoinValueSpace::new();
let mut alloc_value = || join_value_space.alloc_local();
let mut alloc_param = || join_value_space.alloc_param();
ValueId Usage:
| Region | Usage |
|---|---|
| PHI Reserved (0-99) | ❌ Not used |
| Param (100-999) | ✅ ConditionEnv variables |
| Local (1000+) | ✅ All temps (Select, BinOp, Const) |
Test Results:
$ cargo test --release --lib continue
✅ 11 passed (3 ignored)
$ ./target/release/hakorune apps/tests/loop_continue_pattern4.hako
✅ Output: "25" (single carrier)
$ ./target/release/hakorune apps/tests/loop_continue_multi_carrier.hako
✅ Output: "100\n10" (multi carrier)
Comparison Table: Before vs After
Before Phase 202 (Manual Counters)
| Pattern | Allocation Method | Collision Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern 1 | value_counter = 0u32 |
⚠️ Yes (overlaps with ConditionEnv if added) |
| Pattern 2 | value_counter = 0u32 |
⚠️ Yes (collided with Param region) |
| Pattern 3 | value_counter = 0u32 |
⚠️ Yes (overlaps with ConditionEnv if added) |
| Pattern 4 | value_counter + join_value_counter |
⚠️ Yes (dual counter management) |
After Phase 202 (JoinValueSpace)
| Pattern | Allocation Method | Collision Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern 1 | JoinValueSpace.alloc_local() |
✅ No (Local region isolated) |
| Pattern 2 | JoinValueSpace.alloc_param() + alloc_local() |
✅ No (Param/Local disjoint) |
| Pattern 3 | JoinValueSpace.alloc_local() |
✅ No (Local region isolated) |
| Pattern 4 | JoinValueSpace.alloc_param() + alloc_local() |
✅ No (Param/Local disjoint) |
Region Usage Matrix
| Pattern | PHI (0-99) | Param (100-999) | Local (1000+) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern 1 | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ Const, Compare, UnaryOp |
| Pattern 2 | ❌ | ✅ ConditionEnv, CarrierInfo | ✅ Const, BinOp, temps |
| Pattern 3 | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ PHI, Select, BinOp |
| Pattern 4 | ❌ | ✅ ConditionEnv (continue vars) | ✅ Select, BinOp, temps |
Key Insight: Patterns 1 and 3 only need Local region (simple structure), while Patterns 2 and 4 need both Param and Local regions (complex condition analysis).
Benefits Achieved
1. Safety
- ValueId collision impossible: Disjoint regions (PHI/Param/Local) guarantee no overlap
- Contract enforcement: Debug-mode assertions catch violations early
- Future-proof: Easy to add new allocation patterns within regions
2. Consistency
- Single allocation mechanism: All patterns use JoinValueSpace
- Unified API:
alloc_param()/alloc_local()across all patterns - Maintainable: No pattern-specific counter logic
3. Debuggability
- Clear region boundaries: ValueId ranges reveal allocation source
- 100-999 → "This is a Param (ConditionEnv/CarrierInfo)"
- 1000+ → "This is a Local (intermediate value)"
- Traceable: JoinValueSpace provides single point of debug logging
4. Code Quality
- 75 lines removed (Phase 203-A dead code cleanup)
- No manual counter management: Eliminated error-prone increment logic
- Pattern 4 dual counter eliminated: Simplified from 2 counters to 1 allocator
Test Coverage
Build Status
$ cargo build --release --lib
✅ Success (0 errors, 4 warnings)
Unit Tests
$ cargo test --release --lib
✅ 821 passed; 0 failed; 64 ignored
E2E Tests (Representative Cases)
| Test File | Pattern | Expected Output | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| loop_min_while.hako | P1 | "0 1 2" | ✅ PASS |
| minimal_ssa_bug_loop.hako | P2 | RC: 0 | ✅ PASS |
| loop_if_phi.hako | P3 | "9" | ✅ PASS |
| loop_continue_pattern4.hako | P4 | "25" | ✅ PASS |
| loop_continue_multi_carrier.hako | P4 | "100\n10" | ✅ PASS |
| phase200d_capture_minimal.hako | P2 | "30" | ✅ PASS |
No regressions: All existing tests continue to pass.
Architecture Impact
Invariant Strengthening
Added to Section 1.9 of joinir-architecture-overview.md:
- ValueId space diagram (PHI/Param/Local regions)
- Component-to-region mapping table
- Design principles (fixed boundaries, reserve_phi vs alloc_phi)
- Relationship with value_id_ranges.rs (module-level vs intra-lowering)
Component Updates
All pattern lowerers now follow the same structure:
pub fn lower_pattern_X(
// ... pattern-specific params
join_value_space: &mut JoinValueSpace,
) -> Result<JoinModule, ...> {
let mut alloc_local = || join_value_space.alloc_local();
let mut alloc_param = || join_value_space.alloc_param();
// ... lowering logic
}
Callers create JoinValueSpace before calling lowerer:
let mut join_value_space = JoinValueSpace::new();
let result = lower_pattern_X(..., &mut join_value_space)?;
Related Work
Phase 201 (Foundation)
- Introduced JoinValueSpace box
- Migrated Pattern 2 as reference implementation
- Established Param/Local region separation
- Validated with 821 unit tests
Phase 203-A (Cleanup)
- Removed obsolete v1 API (70 lines)
- Converted 3 unit tests to v2 API
- Removed 2 unused imports
- Documented stub functions
Future Phases (Phase 204+)
- Pattern 5 (Trim/JsonParser) integration
- Advanced carrier analysis with JoinValueSpace
- Potential PHI reservation usage (currently unused)
Commit History
6e778948 feat(joinir): Phase 202-A Pattern 1 uses JoinValueSpace
98e81b26 feat(joinir): Phase 202-B Pattern 3 uses JoinValueSpace
ae741d97 feat(joinir): Phase 202-C Pattern 4 uses JoinValueSpace, unify dual counters
References
- Phase 201: JoinValueSpace design and Pattern 2 migration
- JoinValueSpace Implementation:
src/mir/join_ir/lowering/join_value_space.rs - Pattern Lowerers:
simple_while_minimal.rs(Pattern 1)loop_with_break_minimal.rs(Pattern 2)loop_with_if_phi_minimal.rs(Pattern 3)loop_with_continue_minimal.rs(Pattern 4)
- Architecture Overview:
joinir-architecture-overview.mdSection 1.9 - Design Document:
phase201-join-value-space-design.md - Pattern 1 Details:
phase202-a-pattern1-joinvaluespace.md
Conclusion
Phase 202 achieved complete architectural consistency across all JoinIR loop patterns by migrating Pattern 1, 3, and 4 to the unified JoinValueSpace system. This eliminates all ValueId collision risks, simplifies maintenance, and establishes a solid foundation for future JoinIR enhancements.
Key Achievement: 4/4 patterns (100%) now use JoinValueSpace, with 0 manual counter systems remaining in the codebase.