Validation: 100/100 test iterations passed Commits included: -dea7ced42: Phase 1b fix (12% → 0% crash) -4f2bcb7d3: Phase 2 Box化 (3-level contract design) Key achievements: ✓ 0% crash rate (100/100 iterations) ✓ Clear safety contracts (UNSAFE/SAFE/GUARDED) ✓ Future optimization paths documented ✓ Backward compatibility maintained See CHECKPOINT_PHASE2_COMPLETE.md for full analysis. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.1 KiB
4.1 KiB
CHECKPOINT: Phase 2 Box化 Complete
Date: 2025-11-29
Status: ✓ STABLE (100/100 tests passed, 0% crash rate)
Problem Summary
Initial State (Phase 12)
- Implementation: Direct mask+dereference for SuperSlab lookup
- Performance: ~5-10 cycles (fast)
- Safety: ⚠️ UNSAFE - 12% crash rate
- Root Cause: Arbitrary pointers → unmapped addresses → SEGFAULT
Evolution
| Phase | Approach | Performance | Safety | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 12 | mask+dereference | 5-10 cycles | ⚠️ UNSAFE | 12% crash |
| Phase 1a | Range checks | 10-20 cycles | ⚠️ UNSAFE | 10-12% crash (failed) |
| Phase 1b | Registry lookup | 50-100 cycles | ✓ SAFE | 0% crash ✓ |
| Phase 2 | Box化 (3 levels) | Selectable | Contract-based | 0% crash ✓ |
Solution (Phase 1b + Phase 2)
Phase 1b: Immediate Fix
Commit: dea7ced42
Change: Replace ss_fast_lookup() with safe registry lookup
Result: 12% → 0% crash rate
Phase 2: Box化
Commit: 4f2bcb7d3
Design: SuperSlab Lookup Box with 3 contract levels
// Contract Level 1: UNSAFE (5-10 cycles)
ss_lookup_unsafe(ptr); // Internal use only, requires validated pointer
// Contract Level 2: SAFE (50-100 cycles) - RECOMMENDED
ss_lookup_safe(ptr); // Works with arbitrary pointers, 0% crash
// Contract Level 3: GUARDED (100-200 cycles)
ss_lookup_guarded(ptr); // Debug builds only, full validation
Testing Results
Final Checkpoint Validation
Test: 100 iterations of bench_random_mixed_hakmem (200K ops)
SUCCESS: 100/100 (100%)
CRASH: 0/100 (0%)
✓ CHECKPOINT VERIFIED: 100% STABLE
Performance Impact
- Phase 12 (unsafe): 5-10 cycles, 12% crash
- Phase 1b/2 (safe): 50-100 cycles, 0% crash
- Trade-off: 5-10x slower, but crash-free
- Still faster than mincore() syscall (5000-10000 cycles)
Files Modified
Core Implementation
core/superslab/superslab_inline.h- Box integrationcore/box/superslab_lookup_box.h- NEW - Box definition
Cleanup (removed conflicting extern declarations)
core/box/tls_sll_drain_box.hcore/box/external_guard_box.hcore/tiny_free_fast.inc.h
Future Optimization Opportunities
Documented in superslab_lookup_box.h:
Phase 2.1: Hybrid Lookup
- Try UNSAFE first (optimistic fast path)
- Fallback to SAFE on magic check failure
- Best of both: 5-10 cycles (hit), 50-100 cycles (miss)
Phase 2.2: Per-Thread Cache
- Cache last N lookups in TLS (ptr → SuperSlab)
- Expected hit rate: 80-90%
- Cost: 1-2 cycles (hit), 50-100 cycles (miss)
Phase 2.3: Hardware-Assisted Validation
- Use x86 CPUID / ARM PAC for pointer tagging
- Validate pointer origin without registry lookup
- Requires kernel support / specific hardware
Key Insights
Why SEGFAULT Occurred (Even with Correct Code)
-
Public API Nature
void free(void* ptr); // Accepts ANY pointer- Users can pass wrong pointers (stack, global, garbage)
- This is within normal API usage
-
Implementation Mismatch
- Phase 12 assumed: "pointer is HAKMEM allocation"
- Actual usage: Called BEFORE header validation
- Result: Unsafe dereference of arbitrary pointers
-
Probabilistic Failure
- Depends on memory layout
- Masked address may or may not be mapped
- Benchmark: 12% probability of unmapped address
Why Box Pattern is Important
- Clear Contracts: Each API documents preconditions
- Multiple Levels: Choose speed vs safety based on context
- Future-Proof: Enable optimizations without breaking code
- Safety by Default: Recommended API (SAFE) is crash-free
References
- Root cause analysis: In-session rr debugging (run 21/50)
- Test methodology: 50-100 iteration validation loops
- Design discussion: Option A/B/C analysis (user chose Option C)
Conclusion: Phase 2 Box化 provides both immediate stability (0% crash) and future optimization flexibility. This checkpoint represents a robust, well-documented state suitable for production deployment.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code