# Phase 170: JsonParserBox JoinIR Preparation & Re-validation - Completion Report **Date**: 2025-12-07 **Duration**: 1 session (autonomous work) **Status**: ✅ **Complete** - Environment prepared, blockers identified, next phase planned --- ## Executive Summary Phase 170 successfully prepared the environment for JsonParserBox JoinIR validation and identified the critical ValueId boundary mapping issue blocking runtime execution. All tasks completed: - ✅ **Task A-1**: JoinIR routing whitelist expanded (6 JsonParserBox methods + test helper) - ✅ **Task A-2**: ValueId boundary issue identified with full root cause analysis - ⚠️ **Task B**: Mini tests blocked by `using` statement (workaround: simplified test created) - ✅ **Task C**: Next phase direction decided (Option A: Fix boundary mapping) **Key Achievement**: Identified that BoolExprLowerer integration (Phase 167-169) is correct, but the boundary mechanism needs condition variable extraction to work properly. --- ## Phase 170-A: Environment Setup ✅ ### Task A-1: JoinIR Routing Whitelist Expansion **Objective**: Allow JsonParserBox methods to route to JoinIR patterns instead of `[joinir/freeze]`. **Changes Made**: **File**: `src/mir/builder/control_flow/joinir/routing.rs` (lines 68-76) **Added entries**: ```rust // Phase 170-A-1: Enable JsonParserBox methods for JoinIR routing "JsonParserBox._trim/1" => true, "JsonParserBox._skip_whitespace/2" => true, "JsonParserBox._match_literal/2" => true, "JsonParserBox._parse_string/2" => true, "JsonParserBox._parse_array/2" => true, "JsonParserBox._parse_object/2" => true, // Phase 170-A-1: Test methods (simplified versions) "TrimTest.trim/1" => true, ``` **Result**: ✅ Methods now route to pattern matching instead of immediate `[joinir/freeze]` rejection. **Evidence**: ```bash HAKO_JOINIR_DEBUG=1 ./target/release/hakorune local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako # Output: [joinir/pattern2] Generated JoinIR for Loop with Break Pattern (Phase 169) ``` --- ### Task A-2: ValueId Boundary Issue Identification **Objective**: Understand if ValueId boundary mapping affects JsonParserBox tests. **Test Created**: `local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako` (48 lines) - Simplified `_trim` method with same loop structure as JsonParserBox - Two loops with break (Pattern2 x 2) - Condition variables: `start < end`, `end > start` **Findings**: 1. **Pattern Detection**: ✅ Works correctly - Both loops match Pattern2 - JoinIR generation succeeds 2. **Runtime Execution**: ❌ Silent failure - Program compiles successfully - No output produced - Exit code 0 (but no print statements executed) 3. **Root Cause Identified**: ValueId boundary mapping - Condition variables (`start`, `end`) resolved from HOST `variable_map` - HOST ValueIds (33, 34, 48, 49) used directly in JoinIR - Not included in `JoinInlineBoundary` - Merge process doesn't remap them → undefined at runtime **Evidence**: ``` [ssa-undef-debug] fn=TrimTest.trim/1 bb=BasicBlockId(12) inst_idx=0 used=ValueId(33) inst=Compare { dst: ValueId(26), op: Lt, lhs: ValueId(33), rhs: ValueId(34) } [ssa-undef-debug] fn=TrimTest.trim/1 bb=BasicBlockId(12) inst_idx=0 used=ValueId(34) inst=Compare { dst: ValueId(26), op: Lt, lhs: ValueId(33), rhs: ValueId(34) } ``` **Impact**: CRITICAL - Blocks ALL JsonParserBox methods with complex conditions. **Detailed Analysis**: See [phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md](phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md) --- ## Phase 170-B: JsonParserBox Mini Test Re-execution ⚠️ ### Original Test Files **Location**: `tools/selfhost/json_parser_{string,array,object}_min.hako` **Blocker**: `using` statement not working ``` [using] not found: 'tools/hako_shared/json_parser.hako" with JsonParserBox' ``` **Root Cause**: JsonParserBox is defined in external file, not compiled/loaded at runtime. **Impact**: Can't run original integration tests in current form. --- ### Workaround: Simplified Test **Created**: `local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako` **Purpose**: Test same loop structure without `using` dependency. **Structure**: ```nyash static box TrimTest { method trim(s) { // Same structure as JsonParserBox._trim loop(start < end) { ... break } loop(end > start) { ... break } } main(args) { ... } } ``` **Result**: Successfully routes to Pattern2, exposes boundary issue. --- ## Phase 170-C: Next Phase Planning ✅ ### Immediate TODOs (Phase 171+ Candidates) **Priority 1: Fix ValueId Boundary Mapping** (HIGHEST PRIORITY) - **Why**: Blocks all JsonParserBox complex condition tests - **What**: Extract condition variables and add to `JoinInlineBoundary` - **Where**: Pattern lowerers (pattern1/2/3/4) - **Estimate**: 4.5 hours - **Details**: See Option A in [phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md](phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md) **Priority 2: Using Statement / Box Loading** (MEDIUM) - **Why**: Enable actual JsonParserBox integration tests - **What**: Compile and register boxes from `using` statements - **Alternatives**: - Inline JsonParser code in tests (quick workaround) - Auto-compile static boxes (proper solution) **Priority 3: Multi-Loop Function Support** (LOW) - **Why**: `_trim` has 2 loops in one function - **Current**: Each loop calls JoinIR routing separately (seems to work) - **Risk**: May need validation that multiple JoinIR calls per function work correctly --- ### Recommended Next Phase Direction **Option A: Fix Boundary Mapping First** ✅ **RECOMMENDED** **Rationale**: 1. **Root blocker**: Boundary issue blocks ALL tests, not just one 2. **BoolExprLowerer correct**: Phase 169 integration is solid 3. **Pattern matching correct**: Routing and detection work perfectly 4. **Isolated fix**: Boundary extraction is well-scoped and testable 5. **High impact**: Once fixed, all JsonParser methods should work **Alternative**: Option B (simplify code) or Option C (postpone) - both less effective. --- ## Test Results Matrix | Method/Test | Pattern | JoinIR Status | Blocker | Notes | |-------------|---------|---------------|---------|-------| | `TrimTest.trim/1` (loop 1) | Pattern2 | ⚠️ Routes OK, runtime fail | ValueId boundary | `start < end` uses undefined ValueId(33, 34) | | `TrimTest.trim/1` (loop 2) | Pattern2 | ⚠️ Routes OK, runtime fail | ValueId boundary | `end > start` uses undefined ValueId(48, 49) | | `JsonParserBox._trim/1` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime | | `JsonParserBox._skip_whitespace/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime | | `JsonParserBox._match_literal/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime | | `JsonParserBox._parse_string/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime | | `JsonParserBox._parse_array/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime | | `JsonParserBox._parse_object/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime | **Summary**: - **Routing**: ✅ All methods whitelisted, pattern detection works - **Compilation**: ✅ BoolExprLowerer generates correct JoinIR - **Runtime**: ❌ ValueId boundary issue prevents execution - **Integration**: ⚠️ `using` statement blocks full JsonParser tests --- ## Files Modified **Modified**: - `src/mir/builder/control_flow/joinir/routing.rs` (+8 lines, whitelist expansion) **Created**: - `local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako` (+48 lines, test file) - `docs/development/current/main/phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md` (+270 lines, analysis) - `docs/development/current/main/phase170-completion-report.md` (+THIS file) **Updated**: - `CURRENT_TASK.md` (added Phase 170 section with progress summary) - `docs/development/current/main/phase166-validation-report.md` (added Phase 170 update section) --- ## Technical Insights ### Boundary Mechanism Gap **Current Design**: ```rust JoinInlineBoundary::new_inputs_only( vec![ValueId(0)], // JoinIR loop variable vec![loop_var_id], // HOST loop variable ); ``` **What's Missing**: Condition variables! **Needed Design**: ```rust JoinInlineBoundary::new_inputs_only( vec![ValueId(0), ValueId(1), ValueId(2)], // loop var + cond vars vec![loop_var_id, start_id, end_id], // HOST ValueIds ); ``` **Why It Matters**: - `condition_to_joinir.rs` directly references HOST `variable_map` ValueIds - These ValueIds are NOT in JoinIR's fresh allocator space - Without boundary mapping, they remain undefined after merge - Silent failure: compiles but doesn't execute ### Two ValueId Namespaces **HOST Context** (Main MirBuilder): - ValueIds from 0 upward (e.g., `start = ValueId(33)`) - All variables in `builder.variable_map` - Pre-existing before JoinIR call **JoinIR Context** (Fresh Allocator): - ValueIds from 0 upward (independent sequence) - Generated by JoinIR lowerer - Post-merge: remapped to new HOST ValueIds **Bridge**: `JoinInlineBoundary` maps between the two spaces with Copy instructions. **Current Gap**: Only explicitly listed variables get bridged. Condition variables are implicitly referenced but not bridged. --- ## Validation Checklist - [x] Whitelist expanded (6 JsonParserBox methods + test) - [x] Pattern routing verified (Pattern2 detected correctly) - [x] BoolExprLowerer integration verified (generates JoinIR correctly) - [x] Boundary issue identified (root cause documented) - [x] Test file created (simplified _trim test) - [x] Root cause analysis completed (270-line document) - [x] Next phase direction decided (Option A recommended) - [x] Documentation updated (CURRENT_TASK.md, phase166 report) - [x] Files committed (ready for next phase) --- ## Next Phase: Phase 171 - Boundary Mapping Fix **Recommended Implementation**: 1. **Create condition variable extractor** (30 min) - File: `src/mir/builder/control_flow/joinir/patterns/cond_var_extractor.rs` - Function: `extract_condition_variables(ast: &ASTNode, builder: &MirBuilder) -> Vec<(String, ValueId)>` 2. **Update Pattern2** (1 hour) - Extract condition variables before lowering - Create expanded boundary with condition vars - Test with `TrimTest.trim/1` 3. **Update Pattern1, Pattern3, Pattern4** (3 hours) - Apply same pattern - Ensure all patterns include condition vars in boundary 4. **Validation** (30 min) - Re-run `TrimTest.trim/1` → should print output - Re-run JsonParserBox tests (if `using` resolved) **Total Estimate**: 5 hours --- ## Conclusion Phase 170 successfully prepared the environment for JsonParserBox validation and identified the critical blocker preventing runtime execution. The boundary mapping issue is well-understood, with a clear solution path (Option A: extract condition variables). **Key Achievements**: - ✅ Whitelist expansion enables JsonParserBox routing - ✅ BoolExprLowerer integration verified working correctly - ✅ Boundary issue root cause identified and documented - ✅ Clear next steps with 5-hour implementation estimate **Next Step**: Implement Phase 171 - Condition Variable Extraction for Boundary Mapping.