## Summary
Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design.
## Changes
### Paper G (AI Collaboration)
- Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow
- Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule
- Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity
### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns)
- Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型)
- Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence
- Field declaration design as a typical example
### Paper K (Explosive Incidents)
- Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident"
- Updated total count to 46 incidents
- Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach
## Design Decision
After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box:
- Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map)
- Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only)
- Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools
## Philosophy
This discussion exemplifies key principles:
- The best design needs no explanation
- Constraints provide clarity, not limitation
- "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes"
- AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity
🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
