2d5607930c
docs(edgecfg): Phase 280 - Frag Composition SSOT Positioning (A→B→C)
...
## Purpose
Stop pattern number enumeration proliferation by establishing Frag composition API
as the Single Source of Truth (SSOT) for structured control flow → CFG lowering.
Pattern numbers (1-9+) are **symptom labels** for regression tests, NOT architectural
concepts. The architectural SSOT is **Frag composition rules** (seq/if/loop/cleanup).
## Changes Summary
**Phase A (Docs-only, no code)**: SSOT Positioning
- edgecfg-fragments.md: Status Draft → Active SSOT (+243 lines)
- Added 5 sections: Composition SSOT, Rules, Laws, Fail-Fast, Ownership
- Documented 3-tier ownership model (Normalizer/Composition/Lowerer)
- Established composition as pattern absorption destination
- joinir-architecture-overview.md: Pattern absorption documentation (+90 lines)
- Added Section 0.2: Pattern Number Absorption Destination
- JoinIR vs Plan comparison (different extraction, same SSOT)
- Pattern absorption status table (Pattern6/7 as Phase 280 targets)
- phase-280/README.md: Full roadmap (new)
**Phase B (API solidification)**: Contract Verification
- compose.rs: Module-level + function-level Phase 280 docs (+149 lines)
- Documented composition SSOT, ownership model, usage example
- Added constraint/composition law sections to seq/if/loop/cleanup
- Contract verification: All seq/if/loop contracts verified (no gaps)
- Test gap analysis: No missing tests (wires/exits separation explicitly tested)
**Phase C (Pattern preparation)**: Documentation-only
- normalizer.rs: Pattern6/7 TODO comments (+10 lines)
- Pattern6: Early exit doesn't fit compose::if_() → cleanup() target
- Pattern7: 挙動不変保証難 → compose::if_() migration deferred to Phase 281
## Impact
- **Net +460 lines** (docs-heavy, minimal code)
- **4 files modified**, 1 directory created
- **SSOT established**: Frag composition is now THE absorption destination
- **導線固定**: Clear migration path for Pattern6/7 (Phase 281+)
- **No behavior change**: Documentation-only for Phase C (tests not run)
## Phase 280 Goal Achieved
✅ SSOT positioning + 導線固定 (NOT full migration - that's Phase 281)
✅ Phase A complete: Docs updated to "Active SSOT"
✅ Phase B complete: API contract verified and documented
✅ Phase C complete: Pattern6/7 hand-rolled locations documented
## Next Phase (Phase 281+)
- Phase 281: Full Pattern6/7 absorption (replace hand-rolled with compose_*)
- Phase 282: Router shrinkage (pattern numbers → test labels)
- Phase 283+: Pattern8 and beyond
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-23 01:18:36 +09:00
757193891f
feat(llvm/phi): Phase 277 P1 - fail-fast validation for PHI strict mode
...
## Summary
Implemented fail-fast validation for PHI ordering and value resolution in strict mode.
## Changes
### P1-1: Strict mode for "PHI after terminator"
- File: `src/llvm_py/phi_wiring/wiring.py::ensure_phi`
- Behavior: `NYASH_LLVM_PHI_STRICT=1` → RuntimeError if PHI created after terminator
- Default: Warning only (no regression)
### P1-2: Strict mode for "fallback 0"
- File: `src/llvm_py/phi_wiring/wiring.py::wire_incomings`
- Behavior: Strict mode forbids silent fallback to 0 (2 locations)
- Location 1: Unresolvable incoming value
- Location 2: Type coercion failure
- Error messages point to next debug file: `llvm_builder.py::_value_at_end_i64`
### P1-3: Connect verify_phi_ordering() to execution path
- File: `src/llvm_py/builders/function_lower.py`
- Behavior: Verify PHI ordering after all instructions emitted
- Debug mode: Shows "✅ All N blocks have correct PHI ordering"
- Strict mode: Raises RuntimeError with block list if violations found
## Testing
✅ Test 1: strict=OFF - passes without errors
✅ Test 2: strict=ON - passes without errors (no violations in test fixtures)
✅ Test 3: debug mode - verify_phi_ordering() connected and running
## Scope
- LLVM harness (Python) changes only
- No new environment variables (uses existing 3 from Phase 277 P2)
- No JoinIR/Rust changes (root fix is Phase 279)
- Default behavior unchanged (strict mode opt-in)
## Next Steps
- Phase 278: Remove deprecated env var support
- Phase 279: Root fix - unify "2本のコンパイラ" pipelines
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-22 14:48:37 +09:00
a681298889
docs(edgecfg): define bridge-pattern removal criteria (Phase 271)
2025-12-21 23:16:44 +09:00
df715e909e
feat(edgecfg): Phase 268-270 savepoint (if_form adoption + Pattern9 minimal loop SSOT)
2025-12-21 23:12:52 +09:00
86a51cad2b
docs: Phase 267 P0 EdgeCFG Branch (BranchStub + emit_frag)
2025-12-21 20:33:24 +09:00
655a8efbc6
docs: record Phase 265/266 EdgeCFG progress and research note
2025-12-21 17:20:58 +09:00
21387f3816
feat(edgecfg): Phase 265 P2 - seq/if_ 実装(wires/exits 分離)
...
## 目的
「解決済み配線(wires)」と「未解決 exit(exits)」を分離し、
Frag 合成の基本パターンを完成させる。
## 実装内容
### 1. Frag 構造体の変更
- `wires: Vec<EdgeStub>` フィールド追加
- 不変条件:
- exits: target = None のみ(未配線、外へ出る exit)
- wires: target = Some(...) のみ(配線済み、内部配線)
### 2. loop_() の wires 対応
- Break/Continue を exits から wires に移動
- P1 テスト 3個を wires 検証に更新
### 3. seq(a, b) 実装
- a.Normal → b.entry を wires に追加(内部配線)
- seq の exits[Normal] は b の Normal のみ
- 新規テスト 2個追加
### 4. if_(header, cond, t, e, join_frag) 実装
- シグネチャ変更: join: BasicBlockId → join_frag: Frag
- t/e.Normal → join_frag.entry を wires に追加
- if の exits は join_frag.exits
- 新規テスト 2個追加
### 5. verify_frag_invariants() 強化
- wires/exits 分離契約の検証追加(警告のみ)
- Err 化は Phase 266 で実施
## テスト結果
- edgecfg::api: 13/13 PASS(frag 3 + compose 9 + verify 1)
- 全 lib テスト: 1388/1388 PASS(退行なし)
## 核心的な設計判断
1. **wires/exits 分離**:
- 問題: 解決済み配線と未解決 exit を混ぜると再配線バグ
- 解決: 分離して不変条件を強化
- 効果: Phase 266 で wires を MIR terminator に落とすだけ
2. **if_ は join_frag 受け取り**:
- 問題: join: BasicBlockId では「join block」か「join 以降」か曖昧
- 解決: join_frag: Frag で「join 以降」を明確化
- 効果: PHI 生成の柔軟性確保
3. **verify は警告のみ**:
- P2 の役割: wires/exits 分離の証明に集中
- Phase 266 で MIR 生成時に厳格化
## 次フェーズへの橋渡し
- Phase 266: wires を MIR terminator に落とす
- Phase 267: Pattern6/7/8 を Frag 化
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-21 16:47:47 +09:00
cda034fe8f
feat(edgecfg): Phase 265 P1 - compose 配線ロジック実装(test-only PoC)
...
## 目的
Frag/ExitKind が BasicBlockId 層で配線できることを証明
## 実装完了内容
- EdgeStub に target: Option<BasicBlockId> 追加
- compose::loop_() 配線ロジック実装(Continue → header, Break → after)
- verify_frag_invariants() 配線契約検証追加
- test-only PoC で実証完了(5個のテスト)
## 配線契約
- Continue(loop_id) の EdgeStub.target = Some(header)
- Break(loop_id) の EdgeStub.target = Some(after)
- Normal/Return/Unwind の EdgeStub.target = None(上位へ伝搬)
## テスト
- compose::tests: 5 PASS(既存2個更新 + 新規3個追加)
- verify::tests: 1 PASS(基本smoke test)
- cargo test -p nyash-rust --lib: SUCCESS
## 重要な制約
- MIR 命令生成はまだしない(Frag 層の配線能力証明のみ)
- NormalizedShadow/JoinIR層への適用は Phase 266 に繰り越し
- Pattern6/7/8 未改変(配線能力の証明に集中)
## 次のステップ
- Phase 265 P2: seq/if_ 実装(順次合成・条件分岐合成)
- Phase 266: JoinIR-VM Bridge 改修後、NormalizedShadow への適用
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-21 16:22:46 +09:00
ab1510920c
feat(edgecfg): Phase 265 P0 - compose/verify 最小実装(入口SSOT迷子防止)
...
🎯 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-21 13:07:17 +09:00
923a442326
refactor(edgecfg): add Frag/ExitKind API entrypoint (Phase 264 design-first)
...
Phase 264 P0: EdgeCFG Fragment 入口API作成(実装置換なし)
- 入口フォルダ作成: src/mir/builder/control_flow/edgecfg/api/
- コア型定義: ExitKind, EdgeStub, Frag
- 合成関数シグネチャ: seq, if_, loop_, cleanup(中身TODO、pub(crate))
- 最小テスト: 3個のユニットテスト追加(frag.rs)
- ドキュメント連動: edgecfg-fragments.md に実装入口追記
制約遵守:
- 既存 pattern6/7/8 未改変
- merge/EdgeCFG 未改変
- 既存LoopId使用(control_form.rs に PartialOrd, Ord 追加)
- MIR側EdgeArgs使用(JoinIRと混線回避)
- BTreeMap採用(決定的順序保証、Phase 69-3 教訓)
次フェーズ: Phase 265 で Pattern8 適用時に compose::loop_ を実装
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code )
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com >
2025-12-21 12:49:53 +09:00