feat(joinir): Phase 64 - Ownership P3 production integration (dev-only)

P3(if-sum) 本番ルートに OwnershipPlan 解析を接続(analysis-only)。

Key changes:
- ast_analyzer.rs: Added analyze_loop() helper
  - Loop-specific analysis API for production integration
  - build_plan_for_scope() helper for single-scope extraction

- pattern3_with_if_phi.rs: P3 production integration
  - OwnershipPlan analysis after ConditionEnv building
  - check_ownership_plan_consistency() for validation
  - Feature-gated #[cfg(feature = "normalized_dev")]

Consistency checks:
- Fail-Fast: Multi-hop relay (relay_path.len() > 1)
- Warn-only: Carrier set mismatch (order SSOT deferred)
- Warn-only: Condition captures (some patterns have extras)

Tests: 49/49 PASS (2 new Phase 64 tests)
- test_phase64_p3_ownership_prod_integration
- test_phase64_p3_multihop_relay_detection
- Zero regressions

Design: Analysis-only, no behavior change
- Integration point: After ConditionEnv, before JoinIR lowering
- Dev-only validation for future SSOT migration

Next: Phase 65+ - Carrier order SSOT, owner-based init

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
nyash-codex
2025-12-12 23:02:40 +09:00
parent 0ff96612cf
commit ba6e420f31
7 changed files with 929 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
# Phase 64 Summary: Ownership P3 Production Integration (dev-only)
## Goal
Connect OwnershipPlan analysis to production P3(if-sum) route for dev-only validation.
## Changes
### 1. `ast_analyzer.rs`: Added `analyze_loop()` helper
- **Purpose**: Analyze a single loop (condition + body) with parent context
- **Signature**: `analyze_loop(condition, body, parent_defined) -> Result<OwnershipPlan>`
- **Usage**: Called from P3 production route in `pattern3_with_if_phi.rs`
- **Features**:
- Creates temporary function scope for parent-defined variables
- Analyzes loop scope with condition/body AST
- Returns OwnershipPlan for loop scope only
### 2. `pattern3_with_if_phi.rs`: Added dev-only OwnershipPlan call + consistency checks
- **Location**: Inside `lower_pattern3_if_sum()` method, after ConditionEnv building
- **Feature gate**: `#[cfg(feature = "normalized_dev")]`
- **Workflow**:
1. Collect parent-defined variables from `variable_map`
2. Call `analyze_loop()` to produce OwnershipPlan
3. Run `check_ownership_plan_consistency()` checks
4. Continue with existing lowering (analysis-only, no behavior change)
### 3. Consistency checks (`check_ownership_plan_consistency()`)
#### Check 1: Multi-hop relay rejection (Fail-Fast)
- **What**: `relay_path.len() > 1` → Err
- **Why**: Multi-hop relay is out of scope for Phase 64
- **Action**: Return error immediately (Fail-Fast principle)
#### Check 2: Carrier set consistency (warn-only)
- **What**: Compare `plan.owned_vars` (written) vs `carrier_info.carriers`
- **Why**: Verify OwnershipPlan matches existing CarrierInfo
- **Action**: Warn if mismatch (order SSOT deferred to Phase 65+)
#### Check 3: Condition captures consistency (warn-only)
- **What**: Verify `plan.condition_captures``condition_bindings`
- **Why**: Ensure OwnershipPlan condition captures are tracked
- **Action**: Warn if extra captures found
### 4. Regression tests (`normalized_joinir_min.rs`)
#### Test 1: `test_phase64_p3_ownership_prod_integration()`
- **Purpose**: Verify `analyze_loop()` works for simple P3 loops
- **Pattern**: `loop(i < 10) { local sum=0; sum=sum+i; i=i+1; }`
- **Checks**:
- Owned vars: sum (is_written=true), i (is_written=true, is_condition_only=true)
- No relay writes (all loop-local)
- Single-hop relay constraint verified
#### Test 2: `test_phase64_p3_multihop_relay_rejection()`
- **Purpose**: Verify multi-hop relay detection
- **Pattern**: Nested loops with relay write to function-scoped variable
- **Checks**:
- Detects multi-hop relay (`relay_path.len() > 1`)
- Documents that rejection happens in consistency check (not analyze_loop)
## Constraints
- **Dev-only**: `#[cfg(feature = "normalized_dev")]` throughout
- **Analysis-only**: No behavior change to lowering
- **Fail-Fast**: Multi-hop relay (`relay_path.len() > 1`)
- **Warn-only**: Carrier set mismatch (order SSOT deferred)
## Build and Test
```bash
# Build with normalized_dev feature
cargo build --release --features normalized_dev
# Run Phase 64 tests
cargo test --features normalized_dev --test normalized_joinir_min phase64
# Run ownership module tests
cargo test --features normalized_dev --lib ownership
```
Expected: All tests pass, no regressions.
## Next Steps
### Phase 65+: Future Enhancements
1. **Multi-hop relay support**: Remove `relay_path.len() > 1` limitation
2. **Carrier order SSOT**: Use OwnershipPlan to determine carrier order (upgrade warn to error)
3. **Owner-based init**: Replace legacy `FromHost` with owner-based initialization
4. **Full AST coverage**: Extend `analyze_loop()` to handle more complex patterns
## Related Documents
- [Phase 62: Ownership P3 Route Design](phase62-ownership-p3-route-design.md)
- [Phase 63: AST Ownership Analyzer](../../../private/roadmap2/phases/normalized_dev/phase-63-ast-ownership-analyzer.md)
- [JoinIR Architecture Overview](joinir-architecture-overview.md)

View File

@ -91,11 +91,26 @@ OwnershipPlan を導入する際、次を Fail-Fast で固定する:
## Migration Plan (Next Phase)
### Phase 64: P3 本番ルートへ dev-only 接続
### Phase 64: P3 本番ルートへ dev-only 接続 ✅ 実装済み
- `pattern3_with_if_phi.rs` に dev-only で OwnershipPlan を導入
- boundary inputs / exit bindings に対して carrier set の整合チェックを追加し、混線を Fail-Fast で検出可能にする
- carrier order は既存の exit_meta / carrier_info と一致することを前提にし、順序の SSOT 化は後続フェーズで行う
- `pattern3_with_if_phi.rs` に dev-only で OwnershipPlan を導入
- `analyze_loop()` helper API を追加(`ast_analyzer.rs`
- `lower_pattern3_if_sum()` で OwnershipPlan を生成し整合チェック実行
- ✅ boundary inputs / exit bindings に対して carrier set の整合チェックを追加
- `check_ownership_plan_consistency()` 関数を実装
- Fail-Fast: multi-hop relay rejection (`relay_path.len() > 1`)
- Warn-only: carrier set mismatchorder SSOT は後続フェーズ)
- ✅ 回帰テスト追加(`normalized_joinir_min.rs`
- `test_phase64_p3_ownership_prod_integration()`: 基本的な P3 ループ解析
- `test_phase64_p3_multihop_relay_rejection()`: multi-hop relay 検出
**実装サマリ**: `docs/development/current/main/PHASE_64_SUMMARY.md`
### Phase 65+: 後続課題
- Multi-hop relay サポート(`relay_path.len() > 1` 制限の撤廃)
- Carrier order SSOTOwnershipPlan を carrier 順序の SSOT に昇格、warn → error
- Owner-based initlegacy `FromHost` から owner ベース初期化へ移行)
## References

View File

@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
# Phase 64 Implementation Report: Ownership P3 Production Integration
## Executive Summary
**Status**: ✅ Complete
**Date**: 2025-12-12
**Feature Gate**: `normalized_dev`
**Test Results**: 49/49 tests passing, no regressions
Successfully integrated OwnershipPlan analysis into production P3 (if-sum) route with dev-only validation and Fail-Fast consistency checks.
## Implementation Overview
### Changes Made
#### 1. Core API: `analyze_loop()` helper (`ast_analyzer.rs`)
**Purpose**: Analyze a single loop with parent context for P3 production integration.
```rust
pub fn analyze_loop(
condition: &ASTNode,
body: &[ASTNode],
parent_defined: &[String],
) -> Result<OwnershipPlan, String>
```
**Features**:
- Creates temporary function scope for parent-defined variables
- Analyzes loop scope with condition (is_condition=true) and body
- Returns OwnershipPlan for loop scope only (not parent scope)
- Private helper `build_plan_for_scope()` for single-scope extraction
**Key Design**: Avoids analyzing entire function - only analyzes the specific loop being lowered.
#### 2. P3 Production Integration (`pattern3_with_if_phi.rs`)
**Location**: Inside `lower_pattern3_if_sum()` method, after ConditionEnv building
**Integration Point**:
```rust
#[cfg(feature = "normalized_dev")]
{
use crate::mir::join_ir::ownership::analyze_loop;
// Collect parent-defined variables
let parent_defined: Vec<String> = self.variable_map.keys()
.filter(|name| *name != &loop_var_name)
.cloned()
.collect();
// Analyze loop
match analyze_loop(condition, body, &parent_defined) {
Ok(plan) => {
// Run consistency checks
check_ownership_plan_consistency(&plan, &ctx.carrier_info, &condition_binding_names)?;
// Continue with existing lowering (analysis-only)
}
Err(e) => {
// Warn and continue (analysis is optional)
}
}
}
```
**Key Design**: Analysis happens **after** ConditionEnv but **before** JoinIR lowering, ensuring:
- All existing infrastructure is available for comparison
- No behavior change to lowering (analysis-only)
- Fail-Fast on critical errors only (multi-hop relay)
#### 3. Consistency Checks (`check_ownership_plan_consistency()`)
**Check 1: Multi-hop relay rejection (Fail-Fast)**
```rust
for relay in &plan.relay_writes {
if relay.relay_path.len() > 1 {
return Err(format!(
"Phase 64 limitation: multi-hop relay not supported. Variable '{}' has relay path length {}",
relay.name, relay.relay_path.len()
));
}
}
```
**Why Fail-Fast**: Multi-hop relay requires semantic design beyond Phase 64 scope.
**Check 2: Carrier set consistency (warn-only)**
```rust
let plan_carriers: BTreeSet<String> = plan.owned_vars
.iter()
.filter(|v| v.is_written)
.map(|v| v.name.clone())
.collect();
let existing_carriers: BTreeSet<String> = carrier_info.carriers
.iter()
.map(|c| c.name.clone())
.collect();
if plan_carriers != existing_carriers {
eprintln!("[phase64/ownership] Carrier set mismatch (warn-only, order SSOT deferred):");
eprintln!(" OwnershipPlan carriers: {:?}", plan_carriers);
eprintln!(" Existing carriers: {:?}", existing_carriers);
}
```
**Why warn-only**: Carrier order SSOT is deferred to Phase 65+. This is a monitoring check only.
**Check 3: Condition captures consistency (warn-only)**
```rust
let plan_cond_captures: BTreeSet<String> = plan.condition_captures
.iter()
.map(|c| c.name.clone())
.collect();
if !plan_cond_captures.is_subset(condition_bindings) {
let extra: Vec<_> = plan_cond_captures
.difference(condition_bindings)
.collect();
eprintln!("[phase64/ownership] Extra condition captures in plan (warn-only): {:?}", extra);
}
```
**Why warn-only**: Some patterns may legitimately have extra captures during development.
#### 4. Regression Tests (`normalized_joinir_min.rs`)
**Test 1: `test_phase64_p3_ownership_prod_integration()`**
- **Pattern**: `loop(i < 10) { local sum=0; local i=0; sum=sum+i; i=i+1; }`
- **Verifies**:
- Owned vars: sum (is_written=true), i (is_written=true, is_condition_only=true)
- No relay writes (all loop-local)
- Single-hop relay constraint
**Test 2: `test_phase64_p3_multihop_relay_detection()`**
- **Pattern**: Nested loops with function-scoped variable written in inner loop
- **Verifies**:
- Multi-hop relay detection (relay_path.len() = 2)
- Documents that rejection happens in consistency check (not analyze_loop)
### Test Results
```bash
# Phase 64 specific tests
cargo test --features normalized_dev --test normalized_joinir_min test_phase64
# Result: 2/2 passed
# Ownership module tests
cargo test --features normalized_dev --lib ownership
# Result: 23/23 passed
# Full normalized_joinir_min suite
cargo test --features normalized_dev --test normalized_joinir_min
# Result: 49/49 passed (no regressions)
```
## Design Decisions
### Why `analyze_loop()` instead of full function analysis?
**Decision**: Create a loop-specific helper that analyzes only the loop scope.
**Rationale**:
- P3 production route only needs loop-level information
- Full function analysis would require threading through call stack
- Loop-specific API matches the existing P3 lowering architecture
- Simpler to test and verify correctness
### Why dev-only (normalized_dev feature)?
**Decision**: Gate all new code with `#[cfg(feature = "normalized_dev")]`.
**Rationale**:
- Analysis-only implementation (no behavior change)
- Early detection of inconsistencies without risk
- Allows iterative refinement before canonical promotion
- Easy to disable if issues are discovered
### Why Fail-Fast only for multi-hop relay?
**Decision**: Only reject multi-hop relay (`relay_path.len() > 1`), warn for other mismatches.
**Rationale**:
- Multi-hop relay requires semantic design (Phase 65+)
- Carrier set mismatches might indicate existing edge cases (monitor first)
- Condition capture extras might be expected during development
- Fail-Fast only for truly blocking issues
### Why integrate after ConditionEnv building?
**Decision**: Call `analyze_loop()` after ConditionEnv is built but before JoinIR lowering.
**Rationale**:
- ConditionEnv provides condition_bindings for comparison
- CarrierInfo is available from PatternPipelineContext
- ExitMeta will be available after lowering for future comparison
- No behavior change - analysis is non-invasive
## Constraints and Limitations
### Phase 64 Constraints
1. **Single-hop relay only**: `relay_path.len() > 1` → Err
2. **Analysis-only**: No changes to lowering behavior
3. **Dev-only**: `#[cfg(feature = "normalized_dev")]` throughout
4. **Warn-only mismatches**: Carrier set and condition captures
### Known Limitations
1. **No carrier order SSOT**: Existing CarrierInfo order is preserved
2. **No owner-based init**: Legacy `FromHost` initialization unchanged
3. **No multi-hop relay support**: Out of scope for Phase 64
4. **Parent context simplification**: Uses all `variable_map` keys except loop_var
## Future Work (Phase 65+)
### Phase 65: Carrier Order SSOT
**Goal**: Use OwnershipPlan to determine carrier order (upgrade warn to error).
**Changes**:
- Make OwnershipPlan the source of truth for carrier set
- Remove existing carrier inference logic
- Enforce carrier order consistency (fail on mismatch)
### Phase 66: Owner-Based Initialization
**Goal**: Replace legacy `FromHost` with owner-based initialization.
**Changes**:
- Use OwnershipPlan to determine initialization strategy
- Implement proper initialization for relay writes
- Handle condition-only carriers correctly
### Phase 67+: Multi-Hop Relay Support
**Goal**: Remove `relay_path.len() > 1` limitation.
**Semantic Design Needed**:
- How to represent multi-hop relay in JoinIR
- PHI insertion strategy for intermediate loops
- Boundary input/output handling
- Exit line connection across multiple loops
## References
- **Phase 62**: [Ownership P3 Route Design](phase62-ownership-p3-route-design.md)
- **Phase 63**: [AST Ownership Analyzer](../../../private/roadmap2/phases/normalized_dev/phase-63-ast-ownership-analyzer.md)
- **Phase 64 Summary**: [PHASE_64_SUMMARY.md](PHASE_64_SUMMARY.md)
- **JoinIR Architecture**: [joinir-architecture-overview.md](joinir-architecture-overview.md)
## Conclusion
Phase 64 successfully connects OwnershipPlan analysis to production P3 route with:
- ✅ Dev-only validation (no behavior change)
- ✅ Fail-Fast for critical errors (multi-hop relay)
- ✅ Comprehensive consistency checks (carrier set, condition captures)
- ✅ Full test coverage (49/49 tests passing)
- ✅ Zero regressions
The implementation provides a solid foundation for Phase 65+ enhancements while maintaining existing functionality.