Files
hakorune/docs/development/current/main/phases/phase-129/PROGRESS.md

227 lines
7.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Phase 129 Progress Report
## Status: P0-P3 Complete, P1 Requires User Decision
### Completed Tasks ✅
#### P0: LLVM EXE Smoke Test (Commit: e7ad3d31b)
- ✅ Created `phase128_if_only_partial_assign_normalized_llvm_exe.sh`
- ✅ VM+LLVM parity verified for Phase 128
- ✅ Regression tests pass:
- phase103_if_only_llvm_exe.sh: PASS
- phase118_loop_nested_if_merge_llvm_exe.sh: PASS
- phase128_if_only_partial_assign_normalized_vm.sh: PASS
#### P2: Post-If Return Var Fixture (Commit: 083be9921)
- ✅ Created `apps/tests/phase129_if_only_post_if_return_var_min.hako`
- Pattern: `x=1; if flag==1 { x=2 }; print(x)`
- Tests join_k env merge concept
- ✅ Created `phase129_if_only_post_if_return_var_vm.sh`
- Expected output: 2
- Currently PASSES via fallback path (non-Normalized)
#### P3: Documentation (Commits: 083be9921, 0d2eafd78)
- ✅ Phase 129 README (`README.md`)
- Goal, design, scope, acceptance criteria
- join_k continuation pattern explanation
- Structural verification requirements
- ✅ P1 Implementation Plan (`P1-implementation-plan.md`)
- Current state analysis
- Required changes detailed
- Implementation options (A vs B)
- Testing strategy
- Risk assessment
- Open questions
### In-Progress Task 🔄
#### P1: Materialize join_k Continuation
**Current State**: Analysis complete, awaiting user decision
**Key Findings**:
1. Current `lower_if_node` is Phase 123-124 minimal (incomplete)
- Only processes then branch
- No join_k generation
- No branching structure
2. Requires substantial refactoring:
- Create JoinKBuilder helper module
- Refactor lower_if_node signature (affects call chain)
- Add env snapshot/merge logic
- Process post-if statements in join_k body
**Implementation Options**:
**Option A: In-Place Modification**
- Pros: Direct, fast (1 commit)
- Cons: High risk, harder to test incrementally
**Option B: Phased Approach (Recommended)**
- Phase 129-A: JoinKBuilder foundation + helpers
- Phase 129-B: Branch lowering to join_k
- Phase 129-C: Post-if statement support
- Pros: Incremental testing, clear rollback points
- Cons: More commits (3), slightly slower
**Decision Needed**: User/ChatGPT should choose Option A or B
## Test Results Summary
### Library Tests
```bash
cargo test --lib
```
✅ Result: **1165 passed; 0 failed; 56 ignored**
### Smoke Tests
```bash
# Phase 128 VM
phase128_if_only_partial_assign_normalized_vm.sh
```
✅ Result: **PASS** (output: 2)
```bash
# Phase 128 LLVM EXE
phase128_if_only_partial_assign_normalized_llvm_exe.sh
```
✅ Result: **PASS** (output: 2)
```bash
# Phase 129 VM
phase129_if_only_post_if_return_var_vm.sh
```
✅ Result: **PASS** (output: 2)
⚠️ Note: Currently via fallback path (non-Normalized)
```bash
# Regression
phase103_if_only_llvm_exe.sh
phase118_loop_nested_if_merge_llvm_exe.sh
```
✅ Result: **ALL PASS**
## Feedback (Box-First / Fail-Fast / Legacy)
### Box-First Modularization
-**Proposed**: JoinKBuilder module for join_k generation
- Single responsibility: join_k function creation
- Separate file: `join_k_builder.rs`
- Testable in isolation
- 📋 **Future**: Consider extracting env management to EnvBuilder
### Fail-Fast Opportunities
-**Proposed**: `verify_normalized_structure` function
- Early detection of malformed Normalized modules
- Checks: join_k exists if If exists, no PHI instructions
- Returns structured errors with hints
- 📋 **Current**: `verify_branch_is_return_literal` too restrictive
- Should allow Assign statements (Phase 128 already supports)
- Should verify tail-call structure (not just Return)
### Legacy Findings
- ⚠️ **Phase 123-124 Legacy**: `lower_if_node` incomplete implementation
- Only processes then branch (line 463)
- Verification too restrictive for Phase 128+
- No branching structure generated
- **Recommendation**: Mark as Phase 123-124 legacy, replace in Phase 129
- ⚠️ **Placeholder Logic**: lhs_vid uses Const(0) placeholder (line 431-434)
- **Recommendation**: Phase 129 should use actual variable resolution
## Open Questions for User/ChatGPT
1. **Implementation Strategy**: Choose Option A or B?
- Option A: Fast, risky (in-place modification)
- Option B: Safe, incremental (3-phase rollout)
2. **Function ID Allocation**: Where should `next_func_id` come from?
- Add to `lower_if_only_to_normalized` parameters?
- Module tracks max ID?
3. **Post-If Statement Detection**: How to parse post-if nodes?
- StepTree structure provides this?
- Need lookahead logic?
4. **join_k Naming Convention**:
- `join_k_<func_id>`?
- `k_join_<line_number>`?
- Auto-increment `join_k_0`, `join_k_1`, ...?
5. **env Parameter Passing**: Representation?
- Vec<ValueId> (ordered by env_layout)?
- Future: Tuple unpacking?
## Next Steps
### If Option B (Recommended)
**Phase 129-A: Foundation**
1. Create `src/mir/control_tree/normalized_shadow/join_k_builder.rs`
2. Implement JoinKBuilder with:
- `create_join_k_function`
- `snapshot_env`
- `generate_tail_call`
3. Unit tests for JoinKBuilder
4. Commit: "feat(control_tree): Phase 129-A - JoinKBuilder foundation"
**Phase 129-B: Branch Lowering**
1. Refactor `lower_if_node` to use JoinKBuilder
2. Generate then/else tail-calls to join_k
3. Test with simple fixture (no post-if)
4. Commit: "feat(control_tree): Phase 129-B - branch lowering to join_k"
**Phase 129-C: Post-If Support**
1. Process post-if statements in join_k body
2. Test with Phase 129 fixture
3. Add `verify_normalized_structure` checks
4. Commit: "feat(control_tree): Phase 129-C - post-if support + verification"
**Final**
- Update 10-Now.md, INDEX, Backlog
- Commit: "docs: Phase 129 DONE"
### If Option A (Fast Track)
**Single Commit**
1. Implement all changes in one go
2. Extensive testing required before commit
3. Higher rollback risk
4. Commit: "feat(control_tree): Phase 129 - materialize join_k continuation"
## Commits (Current Session)
1. **e7ad3d31b**: test(joinir): Phase 129 P0 - add LLVM EXE smoke for Phase 128
2. **083be9921**: test(joinir): Phase 129 P2 - add post-if return var fixture + VM smoke
3. **0d2eafd78**: docs: Phase 129 P1 implementation plan (join_k materialization)
## Acceptance Status
### P0 ✅ DONE
- [x] Phase 128 LLVM EXE smoke passes
- [x] Regression tests pass
### P1 🔄 AWAITING DECISION
- [ ] JoinKBuilder module created
- [ ] join_k materialized in builder.rs
- [ ] verify_normalized_structure implemented
- [ ] Unit tests pass
### P2 ✅ DONE
- [x] Phase 129 fixture created
- [x] VM smoke test created and passing
- [x] Note: Currently fallback path
### P3 ✅ DONE
- [x] README.md documentation
- [x] P1 implementation plan
- [x] Progress report (this file)
## Summary
**Phase 129 Status**: P0, P2, P3 complete. P1 awaiting user decision on implementation strategy.
**Recommendation**: Choose **Option B (Phased Approach)** for safer, incremental implementation with clear rollback points.
**Key Achievement**: VM+LLVM parity for Phase 128 baseline established. Phase 129 foundation (tests, docs, fixtures) ready for P1 implementation.
**Next Action**: User/ChatGPT decides on Option A vs B, then implement P1 accordingly.