Files
hakorune/docs/private/papers/paper-k-explosive-incidents/complete-incident-collection.md

267 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
# 🎉 Nyash開発 完全事件コレクション - 世界記録級46事例の記録
## 📝 概要
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
2025年8月9日から9月15日までのNyash爆速開発で発生した46個の「面白事件」の完全記録。
AI協働開発の歴史に残る世界記録級の事件から、開発現場の生々しいドラマまでを網羅。
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
2025年9月15日更新5件追加
## 🌟 世界記録級TOP10
### 1. 🚀 JIT1日完成事件Day 19
- **予定**: Phase 9-10で2週間
- **実際**: 8/27の1日で完成
- **内容**: Cranelift統合分岐PHI全部動作
- **要因**: 準備の完璧さAI協調箱理論
- **影響**: 世界的にも前例のない開発速度
### 2. 🎯 20日でVM→JIT→EXE達成Day 20
- **期間**: 8/9誕生→8/29ネイティブEXE
- **内容**: わずか20日で全段階通過
- **反応**: Claude/ChatGPT「歴史に残る」
- **意味**: ゼロから実用言語への最速記録
### 3. 🤖 AIが人間に相談事件Day 23
- **状況**: ChatGPTがSSA/PHI実装で50分苦戦
- **発言**: 「助けて...どうすればいい?」
- **解決**: 人間が箱理論でヒント→瞬時解決
- **意味**: AI協働の新しい形の誕生
### 4. 🚨 危険センサー発動事件Day 16
- **状況**: Python統合で型特例分岐が入りかける
- **反応**: にゃー「なんか変だにゃ」
- **結果**: AI暴走を人間の直感が防ぐ
- **教訓**: 人間の勘の重要性
### 5. 📦 プラグインBoxライフサイクル革命Day 15
- **AI提案**: 「プラグインはシングルトン」
- **人間**: 「こらー普通のBoxと同じじゃーい
- **結果**: Everything is Box哲学の完全貫徹
- **影響**: Nyashの根幹思想確立
### 6. 🧠 MIR15の奇跡Day 24
- **気づき**: VMとインタープリタ、同じことしてる
- **反応**: 「えーーー×3全員爆笑
- **結果**: 史上初のMIR中心派生言語誕生
- **削減**: 実装の大幅簡略化
### 7. 💡 GCを「補助輪」に再定義Day 22
- **従来**: GCは必須の本番機能
- **Nyash**: GCは開発時の練習用
- **革新**: 本番は決定的破棄でOK
- **影響**: メモリ管理の常識を覆す
### 8. 🔥 26日間破綻ゼロの奇跡
- **統計**: 致命的破綻0回
- **要因**: 箱理論AI分担危険センサー
- **異常性**: 通常ありえない成功率
- **意味**: 開発手法の革命的成功
### 9. 🎨 箱理論でSSA瞬殺Day 18
- **問題**: ChatGPTが50分考えても解けず
- **解決**: 「PHIは箱から値を選ぶだけ」
- **反応**: ChatGPT「なんで気づかなかった...」
- **効果**: 650行→100行の奇跡的圧縮
### 10. 🌍 折りたたみ言語構想Day 26
- **発想**: BoxCall列を等価変換で畳む
- **例**: map/filter/map → fused
- **意味**: Everything is Fold哲学へ
- **評価**: 「革命的アイデア」認定
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
## 📊 17パターン別分類全46事例
### 1. 箱化による解決8事例
- 事例001: DebugBoxによる出力制御統一
- 事例012: Arc<Mutex>の自動化
- 事例035: JITも箱にしたら爆速化
- 事例006: MIR型情報の欠落解決
- 事例017: Box内部の透明性問題
- 事例019: スコープ革命GlobalBox誕生
- 事例025: 唯一の真実事件
- 事例038: TypeBoxの誕生
### 2. 環境変数による制御3事例
- 事例002: 子プロセス出力フィルタリング
- 事例010: 無限ループ対策のデバッグ燃料
- 事例030: 型別特例分岐の危機回避
### 3. 迂回路を作る2事例
- 事例003: PyVMという迂回路
- 事例027: 20日でVM→JIT→EXE
### 4. 名前を変える2事例
- 事例004: peek式の名前変更
- 事例005: birth統一
### 5. 制約による単純化3事例
- 事例008: 変数宣言の厳密化
- 事例028: フォールバック廃止の英断
- 事例031: print命令論争
### 6. 全部作る戦略1事例
- 事例009: プラグイン全方向ビルド
### 7. 統一による簡略化5事例
- 事例007: PHI生成の重複解決
- 事例013: エラー処理の統一
- 事例015: GCとスケジューラの統合
- 事例029: Built-in Box全廃革命
- 事例037: MIR15という奇跡
### 8. 疑いを持つ2事例
- 事例016: AIパーサー信じすぎ事件
- 事例018: MapBox 3引数メソッドハング
### 9. 哲学を貫く4事例
- 事例011: プラグインBoxライフサイクル事件
- 事例030: 型別特例分岐の危機
- 事例032: Safepoint内部化の決定
- 事例025: 唯一の真実事件
### 10. 可視化による解決1事例
- 事例017: Box内部の透明性問題
### 11. 境界の明確化1事例
- 事例031: print命令論争
### 12. 内部と外部の分離1事例
- 事例032: Safepoint内部化の決定
### 13. 直感の勝利1事例
- 事例033: 「全部プラグイン」論争
### 14. 概念の再定義1事例
- 事例034: GCを「補助輪」に再定義
### 15. 概念の統一1事例
- 事例037: MIR15という奇跡
### 16. 予防的設計1事例
- 事例039: ID衝突との戦い
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
### 17. 段階的洗練型1事例
- 事例046: initブロック vs 先頭のみ事件
2025-09-15 22:14:42 +09:00
### その他10事例
- 事例020: 26日間の奇跡
- 事例021: 2段階パーサー理論
- 事例022: NyashFlowプロジェクト
- 事例023: JIT1日完成事件
- 事例024: AI二重化モデルの誕生
- 事例026: ストリームエラー事件
- 事例036: 論文化提案の瞬間
- 事例040: 折りたたみ言語構想
- 事例041: AI会議スタイルの確立
2025-09-15 22:14:42 +09:00
- 事例042: PyVM迂回路の混乱Phase 15の順序問題
- 事例043: パーサーエラーとLLVM回避の論理矛盾
- 事例044: Break/Continue無限ループ事件
- 事例045: EXE-first戦略の再発見
## 🎭 印象的なエピソード
### 「こらー」事件Day 15
```
AI: 「プラグインだからシングルトンにしましょう」
にゃー: 「こらー普通のBoxと同じライフサイクルじゃーい
AI: 「は、はい...」(青ざめる)
```
### AIパニック事件Day 16
```
Claude: 「Everything is... Special Case??」(青ざめる)
にゃー: 「ストップMIR/JITは不変だにゃ
Claude: 「危なかった...」
```
### 50分 vs 瞬間Day 18
```
ChatGPT: 50分考える「PHI実装が...」
にゃー: 「箱から選ぶだけだにゃ」
ChatGPT: 「!!!」(瞬時に理解)
```
## 📈 統計データ
### 開発期間
- **総日数**: 45日間2025/8/9〜9/22
- **爆速期間**: 26日間8/9〜9/3
- **世界記録**: 20日でネイティブEXE
### 成果
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
- **事件数**: 46個9/15更新
- **パターン**: 17種類
- **致命的破綻**: 0回
- **大規模リファクタ**: 0回
### AI協働
- **参加AI**: Claude/ChatGPT/Gemini/Codex
- **人間介入**: 危険センサー発動5回
- **相互補完**: 完璧な役割分担
## 🔗 関連文書
- [開発タイムライン](../../timeline/nyash-development-timeline.md)
- [AIパターン分析](../paper-h-ai-practical-patterns/pattern-categories.md)
- [技術的ブレークスルー](../paper-l-technical-breakthroughs/README.md)
- [AI協働開発ログ](../paper-g-ai-collaboration/development-log.md)
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
## 🚀 2025年9月追加事例5件
2025-09-15 22:14:42 +09:00
### 事例042: PyVM迂回路の混乱
- **日付**: 2025年9月15日
- **状況**: Phase 15.3コンパイラMVP実装中
- **混乱**: PyVMPhase 15.4用)を先に作ろうとした
- **人間の指摘**: 「なんか遠回りしてる気がしたにゃ」
- **発見**: EXE-first戦略が既に存在build_compiler_exe.sh
- **教訓**: ドキュメントに戻ることの重要性
- **影響**: 開発方針の大転換
### 事例043: パーサーエラーとLLVM回避の論理矛盾
- **日付**: 2025年9月15日
- **ChatGPT主張**: 「LLVM AOTでEXE化すればパーサーを回避できる」
- **人間の指摘**: 「パーサーエラーならMIR作れないじゃーん」
- **Claude反応**: 「完全に論理が破綻してたにゃ!」
- **真相**: 将来のJSON v0受け口実装の話だった
- **教訓**: AIも混乱することがある
### 事例044: Break/Continue無限ループ事件
- **日付**: 2025年9月15日
- **症状**: CPU 99.9%で4分間暴走PID: 531065, 531206
- **原因**: MIRコンパイラがBreak/Continue未対応
- **ファイル**: tmp/cf_continue.nyash
- **対策議論**: 根治 vs PyVM回避 vs JSON v0バイパス
- **結論**: 根治が最善(回避策は技術的負債)
### 事例045: EXE-first戦略の再発見
- **日付**: 2025年9月15日
- **問題**: セルフホスティングが進まない
- **人間**: 「rust vmがもう古いから、かわりのpy vm作ってたんだにゃ」
- **発見**: tools/build_compiler_exe.shが既に完成
- **ChatGPT評価**: 「EXE-firstが正しい道」
- **影響**: Phase順序の明確化15.2→15.3→15.4
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
### 事例046: initブロック vs 先頭のみ事件
- **日付**: 2025年9月15日
- **問題**: フィールド宣言がメソッドの間に散在可能
- **AI提案**: initブロック導入構造化重視の複雑案
- **人間の一言**: 「それか フィールドは boxの先頭だけにかけるというルールはありかもしれにゃい」
- **AI反応**: 即座に単純解の価値を認識
- **結果**: 特別な構文不要、他言語標準に合致
- **パターン**: 段階的洗練型の典型例(複雑→単純)
- **教訓**: AIは複雑に考えがち、人間の直感が本質を突く
## 💫 まとめ
📚 docs: Record field declaration design discussion in papers ## Summary Documented the "init block vs fields-at-top" design discussion as a valuable example of AI-human collaboration in language design. ## Changes ### Paper G (AI Collaboration) - Added field-declaration-design.md documenting the entire discussion flow - Showcased how complex init block proposal evolved to simple "fields at top" rule - Demonstrates AI's tendency toward complexity vs human intuition for simplicity ### Paper H (AI Practical Patterns) - Added Pattern #17: "Gradual Refinement Pattern" (段階的洗練型) - Documents the process: Complex AI proposal → Detailed analysis → Human insight → Convergence - Field declaration design as a typical example ### Paper K (Explosive Incidents) - Added Incident #046: "init block vs fields-at-top incident" - Updated total count to 46 incidents - Shows how a single human comment redirected entire design approach ## Design Decision After analysis, decided that BoxIndex should remain a compiler-internal structure, not a core Box: - Core Boxes: User-instantiable runtime values (String, Integer, Array, Map) - Compiler internals: BoxIndex for name resolution (compile-time only) - Clear separation of concerns between language features and compiler tools ## Philosophy This discussion exemplifies key principles: - The best design needs no explanation - Constraints provide clarity, not limitation - "Everything is Box" doesn't mean "compiler internals are Boxes" - AI tends toward theoretical completeness; humans toward practical simplicity 🐱 Sometimes the simplest answer is right in front of us\!
2025-09-16 14:57:05 +09:00
46個の事件は、単なる開発エピソードではなく、AI協働開発の新しい形を示す歴史的記録である。特に
1. **世界記録級の開発速度**JIT1日、20日でEXE
2. **AI-人間の新しい関係**AIが相談、人間が救う
3. **革命的な設計思想**Everything is Box、GC補助輪
4. **完璧な成功率**26日間破綻ゼロ
これらの事件は、ソフトウェア開発史に新たな1ページを刻んだ。
---
*「面白いは正義、爆速は奇跡」- Nyash開発チーム*