Files
hakorune/docs/development/current/main/phase170-completion-report.md

305 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Phase 170: JsonParserBox JoinIR Preparation & Re-validation - Completion Report
**Date**: 2025-12-07
**Duration**: 1 session (autonomous work)
**Status**: ✅ **Complete** - Environment prepared, blockers identified, next phase planned
---
## Executive Summary
Phase 170 successfully prepared the environment for JsonParserBox JoinIR validation and identified the critical ValueId boundary mapping issue blocking runtime execution. All tasks completed:
-**Task A-1**: JoinIR routing whitelist expanded (6 JsonParserBox methods + test helper)
-**Task A-2**: ValueId boundary issue identified with full root cause analysis
- ⚠️ **Task B**: Mini tests blocked by `using` statement (workaround: simplified test created)
-**Task C**: Next phase direction decided (Option A: Fix boundary mapping)
**Key Achievement**: Identified that BoolExprLowerer integration (Phase 167-169) is correct, but the boundary mechanism needs condition variable extraction to work properly.
---
## Phase 170-A: Environment Setup ✅
### Task A-1: JoinIR Routing Whitelist Expansion
**Objective**: Allow JsonParserBox methods to route to JoinIR patterns instead of `[joinir/freeze]`.
**Changes Made**:
**File**: `src/mir/builder/control_flow/joinir/routing.rs` (lines 68-76)
**Added entries**:
```rust
// Phase 170-A-1: Enable JsonParserBox methods for JoinIR routing
"JsonParserBox._trim/1" => true,
"JsonParserBox._skip_whitespace/2" => true,
"JsonParserBox._match_literal/2" => true,
"JsonParserBox._parse_string/2" => true,
"JsonParserBox._parse_array/2" => true,
"JsonParserBox._parse_object/2" => true,
// Phase 170-A-1: Test methods (simplified versions)
"TrimTest.trim/1" => true,
```
**Result**: ✅ Methods now route to pattern matching instead of immediate `[joinir/freeze]` rejection.
**Evidence**:
```bash
HAKO_JOINIR_DEBUG=1 ./target/release/hakorune local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako
# Output: [joinir/pattern2] Generated JoinIR for Loop with Break Pattern (Phase 169)
```
---
### Task A-2: ValueId Boundary Issue Identification
**Objective**: Understand if ValueId boundary mapping affects JsonParserBox tests.
**Test Created**: `local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako` (48 lines)
- Simplified `_trim` method with same loop structure as JsonParserBox
- Two loops with break (Pattern2 x 2)
- Condition variables: `start < end`, `end > start`
**Findings**:
1. **Pattern Detection**: ✅ Works correctly
- Both loops match Pattern2
- JoinIR generation succeeds
2. **Runtime Execution**: ❌ Silent failure
- Program compiles successfully
- No output produced
- Exit code 0 (but no print statements executed)
3. **Root Cause Identified**: ValueId boundary mapping
- Condition variables (`start`, `end`) resolved from HOST `variable_map`
- HOST ValueIds (33, 34, 48, 49) used directly in JoinIR
- Not included in `JoinInlineBoundary`
- Merge process doesn't remap them → undefined at runtime
**Evidence**:
```
[ssa-undef-debug] fn=TrimTest.trim/1 bb=BasicBlockId(12) inst_idx=0 used=ValueId(33) inst=Compare { dst: ValueId(26), op: Lt, lhs: ValueId(33), rhs: ValueId(34) }
[ssa-undef-debug] fn=TrimTest.trim/1 bb=BasicBlockId(12) inst_idx=0 used=ValueId(34) inst=Compare { dst: ValueId(26), op: Lt, lhs: ValueId(33), rhs: ValueId(34) }
```
**Impact**: CRITICAL - Blocks ALL JsonParserBox methods with complex conditions.
**Detailed Analysis**: See [phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md](phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md)
---
## Phase 170-B: JsonParserBox Mini Test Re-execution ⚠️
### Original Test Files
**Location**: `tools/selfhost/json_parser_{string,array,object}_min.hako`
**Blocker**: `using` statement not working
```
[using] not found: 'tools/hako_shared/json_parser.hako" with JsonParserBox'
```
**Root Cause**: JsonParserBox is defined in external file, not compiled/loaded at runtime.
**Impact**: Can't run original integration tests in current form.
---
### Workaround: Simplified Test
**Created**: `local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako`
**Purpose**: Test same loop structure without `using` dependency.
**Structure**:
```nyash
static box TrimTest {
method trim(s) {
// Same structure as JsonParserBox._trim
loop(start < end) { ... break }
loop(end > start) { ... break }
}
main(args) { ... }
}
```
**Result**: Successfully routes to Pattern2, exposes boundary issue.
---
## Phase 170-C: Next Phase Planning ✅
### Immediate TODOs (Phase 171+ Candidates)
**Priority 1: Fix ValueId Boundary Mapping** (HIGHEST PRIORITY)
- **Why**: Blocks all JsonParserBox complex condition tests
- **What**: Extract condition variables and add to `JoinInlineBoundary`
- **Where**: Pattern lowerers (pattern1/2/3/4)
- **Estimate**: 4.5 hours
- **Details**: See Option A in [phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md](phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md)
**Priority 2: Using Statement / Box Loading** (MEDIUM)
- **Why**: Enable actual JsonParserBox integration tests
- **What**: Compile and register boxes from `using` statements
- **Alternatives**:
- Inline JsonParser code in tests (quick workaround)
- Auto-compile static boxes (proper solution)
**Priority 3: Multi-Loop Function Support** (LOW)
- **Why**: `_trim` has 2 loops in one function
- **Current**: Each loop calls JoinIR routing separately (seems to work)
- **Risk**: May need validation that multiple JoinIR calls per function work correctly
---
### Recommended Next Phase Direction
**Option A: Fix Boundary Mapping First** ✅ **RECOMMENDED**
**Rationale**:
1. **Root blocker**: Boundary issue blocks ALL tests, not just one
2. **BoolExprLowerer correct**: Phase 169 integration is solid
3. **Pattern matching correct**: Routing and detection work perfectly
4. **Isolated fix**: Boundary extraction is well-scoped and testable
5. **High impact**: Once fixed, all JsonParser methods should work
**Alternative**: Option B (simplify code) or Option C (postpone) - both less effective.
---
## Test Results Matrix
| Method/Test | Pattern | JoinIR Status | Blocker | Notes |
|-------------|---------|---------------|---------|-------|
| `TrimTest.trim/1` (loop 1) | Pattern2 | ⚠️ Routes OK, runtime fail | ValueId boundary | `start < end` uses undefined ValueId(33, 34) |
| `TrimTest.trim/1` (loop 2) | Pattern2 | ⚠️ Routes OK, runtime fail | ValueId boundary | `end > start` uses undefined ValueId(48, 49) |
| `JsonParserBox._trim/1` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime |
| `JsonParserBox._skip_whitespace/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime |
| `JsonParserBox._match_literal/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime |
| `JsonParserBox._parse_string/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime |
| `JsonParserBox._parse_array/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime |
| `JsonParserBox._parse_object/2` | (untested) | - | Using statement | Can't load JsonParserBox at runtime |
**Summary**:
- **Routing**: ✅ All methods whitelisted, pattern detection works
- **Compilation**: ✅ BoolExprLowerer generates correct JoinIR
- **Runtime**: ❌ ValueId boundary issue prevents execution
- **Integration**: ⚠️ `using` statement blocks full JsonParser tests
---
## Files Modified
**Modified**:
- `src/mir/builder/control_flow/joinir/routing.rs` (+8 lines, whitelist expansion)
**Created**:
- `local_tests/test_trim_main_pattern.hako` (+48 lines, test file)
- `docs/development/current/main/phase170-valueid-boundary-analysis.md` (+270 lines, analysis)
- `docs/development/current/main/phase170-completion-report.md` (+THIS file)
**Updated**:
- `CURRENT_TASK.md` (added Phase 170 section with progress summary)
- `docs/development/current/main/phase166-validation-report.md` (added Phase 170 update section)
---
## Technical Insights
### Boundary Mechanism Gap
**Current Design**:
```rust
JoinInlineBoundary::new_inputs_only(
vec![ValueId(0)], // JoinIR loop variable
vec![loop_var_id], // HOST loop variable
);
```
**What's Missing**: Condition variables!
**Needed Design**:
```rust
JoinInlineBoundary::new_inputs_only(
vec![ValueId(0), ValueId(1), ValueId(2)], // loop var + cond vars
vec![loop_var_id, start_id, end_id], // HOST ValueIds
);
```
**Why It Matters**:
- `condition_to_joinir.rs` directly references HOST `variable_map` ValueIds
- These ValueIds are NOT in JoinIR's fresh allocator space
- Without boundary mapping, they remain undefined after merge
- Silent failure: compiles but doesn't execute
### Two ValueId Namespaces
**HOST Context** (Main MirBuilder):
- ValueIds from 0 upward (e.g., `start = ValueId(33)`)
- All variables in `builder.variable_map`
- Pre-existing before JoinIR call
**JoinIR Context** (Fresh Allocator):
- ValueIds from 0 upward (independent sequence)
- Generated by JoinIR lowerer
- Post-merge: remapped to new HOST ValueIds
**Bridge**: `JoinInlineBoundary` maps between the two spaces with Copy instructions.
**Current Gap**: Only explicitly listed variables get bridged. Condition variables are implicitly referenced but not bridged.
---
## Validation Checklist
- [x] Whitelist expanded (6 JsonParserBox methods + test)
- [x] Pattern routing verified (Pattern2 detected correctly)
- [x] BoolExprLowerer integration verified (generates JoinIR correctly)
- [x] Boundary issue identified (root cause documented)
- [x] Test file created (simplified _trim test)
- [x] Root cause analysis completed (270-line document)
- [x] Next phase direction decided (Option A recommended)
- [x] Documentation updated (CURRENT_TASK.md, phase166 report)
- [x] Files committed (ready for next phase)
---
## Next Phase: Phase 171 - Boundary Mapping Fix
**Recommended Implementation**:
1. **Create condition variable extractor** (30 min)
- File: `src/mir/builder/control_flow/joinir/patterns/cond_var_extractor.rs`
- Function: `extract_condition_variables(ast: &ASTNode, builder: &MirBuilder) -> Vec<(String, ValueId)>`
2. **Update Pattern2** (1 hour)
- Extract condition variables before lowering
- Create expanded boundary with condition vars
- Test with `TrimTest.trim/1`
3. **Update Pattern1, Pattern3, Pattern4** (3 hours)
- Apply same pattern
- Ensure all patterns include condition vars in boundary
4. **Validation** (30 min)
- Re-run `TrimTest.trim/1` → should print output
- Re-run JsonParserBox tests (if `using` resolved)
**Total Estimate**: 5 hours
---
## Conclusion
Phase 170 successfully prepared the environment for JsonParserBox validation and identified the critical blocker preventing runtime execution. The boundary mapping issue is well-understood, with a clear solution path (Option A: extract condition variables).
**Key Achievements**:
- ✅ Whitelist expansion enables JsonParserBox routing
- ✅ BoolExprLowerer integration verified working correctly
- ✅ Boundary issue root cause identified and documented
- ✅ Clear next steps with 5-hour implementation estimate
**Next Step**: Implement Phase 171 - Condition Variable Extraction for Boundary Mapping.