hakmem

Files

Moe Charm (CI) b2724e6f5d Phase ALLOC-TINY-FAST-DUALHOT-1: WIP (regression), FREE DUALHOT confirmed +13%

**ALLOC-TINY-FAST-DUALHOT-1** (this phase):
- Implementation: malloc_tiny_fast() C0-C3 early-exit with policy snapshot skip
- ENV: HAKMEM_TINY_ALLOC_DUALHOT=0/1 (default OFF)
- A/B Result: -1.17% median regression (Mixed, 10-run)
- Root Cause: Branch prediction penalty on C4-C7 outweighs policy skip benefit
- Decision: Freeze as research box (default OFF)
- Difference from FREE: ALLOC requires structural changes (per-class paths)

**FREE-TINY-FAST-DUALHOT-1** (verified):
- A/B Confirmation: +13.00% improvement (42.08M → 47.81M ops/s, Mixed, 10-run)
- Success Criteria: +2% target ACHIEVED
- Health Check: PASS (verify_health_profiles.sh, ENV OFF/ON)
- Safety: HAKMEM_TINY_LARSON_FIX guard in place
- Decision: Promotion to MIXED_TINYV3_C7_SAFE profile candidate

**Next Steps**:
- Profile adoption of FREE DUALHOT for MIXED workload
- No further deep-dive on ALLOC optimization (deferred to future phases)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

2025-12-13 05:10:45 +09:00

fast_cache.h

Front-Direct implementation: SS→FC direct refill + SLL complete bypass

2025-11-14 05:41:49 +09:00

malloc_tiny_fast.h

Phase ALLOC-TINY-FAST-DUALHOT-1: WIP (regression), FREE DUALHOT confirmed +13%

2025-12-13 05:10:45 +09:00

quick_slot.h

Front-Direct implementation: SS→FC direct refill + SLL complete bypass

2025-11-14 05:41:49 +09:00

tiny_heap_v2.h

Phase ML1: Pool v1 memset 89.73% overhead 軽量化 (+15.34% improvement)