## Phase 1: Utilization-Aware Superslab Tiering (案B実装済) - Add ss_tier_box.h: Classify SuperSlabs into HOT/DRAINING/FREE based on utilization - HOT (>25%): Accept new allocations - DRAINING (≤25%): Drain only, no new allocs - FREE (0%): Ready for eager munmap - Enhanced shared_pool_release_slab(): - Check tier transition after each slab release - If tier→FREE: Force remaining slots to EMPTY and call superslab_free() immediately - Bypasses LRU cache to prevent registry bloat from accumulating DRAINING SuperSlabs - Test results (bench_random_mixed_hakmem): - 1M iterations: ✅ ~1.03M ops/s (previously passed) - 10M iterations: ✅ ~1.15M ops/s (previously: registry full error) - 50M iterations: ✅ ~1.08M ops/s (stress test) ## Phase 2: Tiny Front Routing Policy (新規Box) - Add tiny_route_box.h/c: Single 8-byte table for class→routing decisions - ROUTE_TINY_ONLY: Tiny front exclusive (no fallback) - ROUTE_TINY_FIRST: Try Tiny, fallback to Pool if fails - ROUTE_POOL_ONLY: Skip Tiny entirely - Profiles via HAKMEM_TINY_PROFILE ENV: - "hot": C0-C3=TINY_ONLY, C4-C6=TINY_FIRST, C7=POOL_ONLY - "conservative" (default): All TINY_FIRST - "off": All POOL_ONLY (disable Tiny) - "full": All TINY_ONLY (microbench mode) - A/B test results (ws=256, 100k ops random_mixed): - Default (conservative): ~2.90M ops/s - hot: ~2.65M ops/s (more conservative) - off: ~2.86M ops/s - full: ~2.98M ops/s (slightly best) ## Design Rationale ### Registry Pressure Fix (案B) - Problem: DRAINING tier SS occupied registry indefinitely - Solution: When total_active_blocks→0, immediately free to clear registry slot - Result: No more "registry full" errors under stress ### Routing Policy Box (新) - Problem: Tiny front optimization scattered across ENV/branches - Solution: Centralize routing in single table, select profiles via ENV - Benefit: Safe A/B testing without touching hot path code - Future: Integrate with RSS budget/learning layers for dynamic profile switching ## Next Steps (性能最適化) - Profile Tiny front internals (TLS SLL, FastCache, Superslab backend latency) - Identify bottleneck between current ~2.9M ops/s and mimalloc ~100M ops/s - Consider: - Reduce shared pool lock contention - Optimize unified cache hit rate - Streamline Superslab carving logic 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Docs Overview
このフォルダは hakmem の設計・計測・運用メモを体系化して管理する場所です。
- INDEX.md: 目次(各ドキュメントへのリンク)
- benchmarks/: ベンチマーク手順とスイープ結果の保存先
- specs/: 現在の仕様(SACS‑3/HW/ENV)を集約
- roadmap/: これからの実装計画・優先度・タスク
運用ルール(提案)
- 1つの変更/計測のまとまりにつき1ファイル(or 1フォルダ)
- 再現コマンド・環境変数・ハード構成は必ず記載
- 大きな連続出力はファイルへ保存し、本文からは抜粋/要約を記載