# L1D Cache Miss Analysis - Document Index

**Investigation Date**: 2025-11-19
**Status**: ✅ COMPLETE - READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION
**Total Analysis**: 1,927 lines across 4 comprehensive reports

---

## 📋 Quick Navigation

### 🚀 Start Here: Executive Summary
**File**: [`L1D_CACHE_MISS_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md`](L1D_CACHE_MISS_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md)
**Length**: 352 lines
**Read Time**: 10 minutes

**What's Inside**:
- TL;DR: 3.8x performance gap root cause identified (L1D cache misses)
- Key findings summary (9.9x more L1D misses than System malloc)
- 3-phase optimization plan overview
- Immediate action items (start TODAY!)
- Success criteria and timeline

**Who Should Read**: Everyone (management, developers, reviewers)

---

### 📊 Deep Dive: Full Technical Analysis
**File**: [`L1D_CACHE_MISS_ANALYSIS_REPORT.md`](L1D_CACHE_MISS_ANALYSIS_REPORT.md)
**Length**: 619 lines
**Read Time**: 30 minutes

**What's Inside**:
- Phase 1: Detailed perf profiling results
  - L1D loads, misses, miss rates (HAKMEM vs System)
  - Throughput comparison (24.9M vs 92.3M ops/s)
  - I-cache analysis (control metric)

- Phase 2: Data structure analysis
  - SuperSlab metadata layout (1112 bytes, 18 cache lines)
  - TinySlabMeta field-by-field analysis
  - TLS cache layout (g_tls_sll_head + g_tls_sll_count)
  - Cache line alignment issues

- Phase 3: System malloc comparison (glibc tcache)
  - tcache design principles
  - HAKMEM vs tcache access pattern comparison
  - Root cause: 3-4 cache lines vs tcache's 1 cache line

- Phase 4: Optimization proposals (P1-P3)
  - **Priority 1** (Quick Wins, 1-2 days):
    - Proposal 1.1: Hot/Cold SlabMeta Split (+15-20%)
    - Proposal 1.2: Prefetch Optimization (+8-12%)
    - Proposal 1.3: TLS Cache Merge (+12-18%)
    - **Cumulative: +36-49%**

  - **Priority 2** (Medium Effort, 1 week):
    - Proposal 2.1: SuperSlab Hot Field Clustering (+18-25%)
    - Proposal 2.2: Dynamic SlabMeta Allocation (+20-28%)
    - **Cumulative: +70-100%**

  - **Priority 3** (High Impact, 2 weeks):
    - Proposal 3.1: TLS-Local Metadata Cache (+80-120%)
    - Proposal 3.2: SuperSlab Affinity (+18-25%)
    - **Cumulative: +150-200% (tcache parity!)**

- Action plan with timelines
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
- Validation plan (perf metrics, regression tests, stress tests)

**Who Should Read**: Developers implementing optimizations, technical reviewers, architecture team

---

### 🎨 Visual Guide: Diagrams & Heatmaps
**File**: [`L1D_CACHE_MISS_HOTSPOT_DIAGRAM.md`](L1D_CACHE_MISS_HOTSPOT_DIAGRAM.md)
**Length**: 271 lines
**Read Time**: 15 minutes

**What's Inside**:
- Memory access pattern flowcharts
  - Current HAKMEM (1.88M L1D misses)
  - Optimized HAKMEM (target: 0.5M L1D misses)
  - System malloc (0.19M L1D misses, reference)

- Cache line access heatmaps
  - SuperSlab structure (18 cache lines)
  - TLS cache (2 cache lines)
  - Color-coded miss rates (🔥 Hot = High Miss, 🟢 Cool = Low Miss)

- Before/after comparison tables
  - Cache lines touched per operation
  - L1D miss rate progression (1.69% → 1.1% → 0.7% → 0.5%)
  - Throughput improvement roadmap (24.9M → 37M → 50M → 70M ops/s)

- Performance impact summary
  - Phase-by-phase cumulative results
  - System malloc parity progression

**Who Should Read**: Visual learners, managers (quick impact assessment), developers (understand hotspots)

---

### 🛠️ Implementation Guide: Step-by-Step Instructions
**File**: [`L1D_OPTIMIZATION_QUICK_START_GUIDE.md`](L1D_OPTIMIZATION_QUICK_START_GUIDE.md)
**Length**: 685 lines
**Read Time**: 45 minutes (reference, not continuous reading)

**What's Inside**:
- **Phase 1: Prefetch Optimization** (2-3 hours)
  - Step 1.1: Add prefetch to refill path (code snippets)
  - Step 1.2: Add prefetch to alloc path (code snippets)
  - Step 1.3: Build & test instructions
  - Expected: +8-12% gain

- **Phase 2: Hot/Cold SlabMeta Split** (4-6 hours)
  - Step 2.1: Define new structures (`TinySlabMetaHot`, `TinySlabMetaCold`)
  - Step 2.2: Update `SuperSlab` structure
  - Step 2.3: Add migration accessors (compatibility layer)
  - Step 2.4: Migrate critical hot paths (refill, alloc, free)
  - Step 2.5: Build & test with AddressSanitizer
  - Expected: +15-20% gain (cumulative: +25-35%)

- **Phase 3: TLS Cache Merge** (6-8 hours)
  - Step 3.1: Define `TLSCacheEntry` struct
  - Step 3.2: Replace `g_tls_sll_head[]` + `g_tls_sll_count[]`
  - Step 3.3: Update allocation fast path
  - Step 3.4: Update free fast path
  - Step 3.5: Build & comprehensive testing
  - Expected: +12-18% gain (cumulative: +36-49%)

- Validation checklist (performance, correctness, safety, stability)
- Rollback procedures (per-phase revert instructions)
- Troubleshooting guide (common issues + debug commands)
- Next steps (Priority 2-3 roadmap)

**Who Should Read**: Developers implementing changes (copy-paste ready code!), QA engineers (validation procedures)

---

## 🎯 Quick Decision Matrix

### "I have 10 minutes"
👉 Read: **Executive Summary** (pages 1-5)
- Get high-level understanding
- Understand ROI (+36-49% in 1-2 days!)
- Decide: Go/No-Go

### "I need to present to management"
👉 Read: **Executive Summary** + **Hotspot Diagrams** (sections: TL;DR, Key Findings, Optimization Plan, Performance Impact Summary)
- Visual charts for presentations
- Clear ROI metrics
- Timeline and milestones

### "I'm implementing the optimizations"
👉 Read: **Quick Start Guide** (Phase 1-3 step-by-step)
- Copy-paste code snippets
- Build & test commands
- Troubleshooting tips

### "I need to understand the root cause"
👉 Read: **Full Technical Analysis** (Phase 1-3)
- Perf profiling methodology
- Data structure deep dive
- tcache comparison

### "I'm reviewing the design"
👉 Read: **Full Technical Analysis** (Phase 4: Optimization Proposals)
- Detailed proposal for each optimization
- Risk assessment
- Expected impact calculations

---

## 📈 Performance Roadmap at a Glance

```
Baseline:       24.9M ops/s, L1D miss rate 1.69%
                ↓
After P1:       34-37M ops/s (+36-49%), L1D miss rate 1.0-1.1%
  (1-2 days)    ↓
After P2:       42-50M ops/s (+70-100%), L1D miss rate 0.6-0.7%
  (1 week)      ↓
After P3:       60-70M ops/s (+150-200%), L1D miss rate 0.4-0.5%
  (2 weeks)     ↓
System malloc:  92M ops/s (baseline), L1D miss rate 0.46%

Target: 65-76% of System malloc performance (tcache parity!)
```

---

## 🔬 Perf Profiling Data Summary

### Baseline Metrics (HAKMEM, Random Mixed 256B, 1M iterations)

| Metric | Value | Notes |
|--------|-------|-------|
| Throughput | 24.88M ops/s | 3.71x slower than System |
| L1D loads | 111.5M | 2.73x more than System |
| **L1D misses** | **1.88M** | **9.9x worse than System** 🔥 |
| L1D miss rate | 1.69% | 3.67x worse |
| L1 I-cache misses | 40.8K | Negligible (not bottleneck) |
| Instructions | 275.2M | 2.98x more |
| Cycles | 180.9M | 4.04x more |
| IPC | 1.52 | Memory-bound (low IPC) |

### System malloc Reference (1M iterations)

| Metric | Value | Notes |
|--------|-------|-------|
| Throughput | 92.31M ops/s | Baseline (100%) |
| L1D loads | 40.8M | Efficient |
| L1D misses | 0.19M | Excellent locality |
| L1D miss rate | 0.46% | Best-in-class |
| L1 I-cache misses | 2.2K | Minimal code overhead |
| Instructions | 92.3M | Minimal |
| Cycles | 44.7M | Fast execution |
| IPC | 2.06 | CPU-bound (high IPC) |

**Gap Analysis**: 338M cycles penalty from L1D misses (75% of total 450M gap)

---

## 🎓 Key Insights

### 1. L1D Cache Misses are the PRIMARY Bottleneck
- **9.9x more misses** than System malloc
- **75% of performance gap** attributed to cache misses
- Root cause: Metadata-heavy access pattern (3-4 cache lines vs tcache's 1)

### 2. SuperSlab Design is Cache-Hostile
- 1112 bytes (18 cache lines) per SuperSlab
- Hot fields scattered (bitmasks on line 0, SlabMeta on line 9+)
- 600-byte offset from SuperSlab base to hot metadata (cache line miss!)

### 3. TLS Cache Split Hurts Performance
- `g_tls_sll_head[]` and `g_tls_sll_count[]` in separate cache lines
- Every alloc/free touches 2 cache lines (head + count)
- glibc tcache avoids this by rarely checking counts[] in hot path

### 4. Quick Wins are Achievable
- Prefetch: +8-12% in 2-3 hours
- Hot/Cold Split: +15-20% in 4-6 hours
- TLS Merge: +12-18% in 6-8 hours
- **Total: +36-49% in 1-2 days!** 🚀

### 5. tcache Parity is Realistic
- With 3-phase plan: +150-200% cumulative
- Target: 60-70M ops/s (65-76% of System malloc)
- Timeline: 2 weeks of focused development

---

## 🚀 Immediate Next Steps

### Today (2-3 hours):
1. ✅ Review Executive Summary (10 minutes)
2. 🚀 Start **Proposal 1.2 (Prefetch)** implementation
3. 📊 Run baseline benchmark (save current metrics)

**Code to Add** (Quick Start Guide, Phase 1):
```c
// File: core/hakmem_tiny_refill_p0.inc.h
if (tls->ss) {
    __builtin_prefetch(&tls->ss->slab_bitmap, 0, 3);
}
__builtin_prefetch(&meta->freelist, 0, 3);
```

**Expected**: +8-12% gain in **2-3 hours**! 🎯

### Tomorrow (4-6 hours):
1. 🛠️ Implement **Proposal 1.1 (Hot/Cold Split)**
2. 🧪 Test with AddressSanitizer
3. 📈 Benchmark (expect +15-20% additional)

### Week 1 Target:
- Complete **Phase 1 (Quick Wins)**
- L1D miss rate: 1.69% → 1.0-1.1%
- Throughput: 24.9M → 34-37M ops/s (+36-49%)

---

## 📞 Support & Questions

### Common Questions:

**Q: Why is prefetch the first priority?**
A: Lowest implementation effort (2-3 hours) with measurable gain (+8-12%). Builds confidence and momentum for larger refactors.

**Q: Is the hot/cold split backward compatible?**
A: Yes! Compatibility layer (accessor functions) allows gradual migration. No big-bang refactor needed.

**Q: What if performance regresses?**
A: Easy rollback (each phase is independent). See Quick Start Guide § "Rollback Plan" for per-phase revert instructions.

**Q: How do I validate correctness?**
A: Full validation checklist in Quick Start Guide:
- Unit tests (existing suite)
- AddressSanitizer (memory safety)
- Stress test (100M ops, 1 hour)
- Multi-threaded (Larson 4T)

**Q: When can we achieve tcache parity?**
A: 2 weeks with Phase 3 (TLS metadata cache). Requires architectural change but delivers +150-200% cumulative gain.

---

## 📚 Related Documents

- **`CLAUDE.md`**: Project overview, development history
- **`PHASE2B_TLS_ADAPTIVE_SIZING.md`**: TLS cache adaptive sizing (related to Proposal 1.3)
- **`ACE_INVESTIGATION_REPORT.md`**: ACE learning layer (future integration with L1D optimization)

---

## ✅ Document Checklist

- [x] Executive Summary (352 lines) - High-level overview
- [x] Full Technical Analysis (619 lines) - Deep dive
- [x] Hotspot Diagrams (271 lines) - Visual guide
- [x] Quick Start Guide (685 lines) - Implementation instructions
- [x] Index (this document) - Navigation & quick reference

**Total**: 1,927 lines of comprehensive L1D cache miss analysis

**Status**: ✅ READY FOR IMPLEMENTATION - All documentation complete!

---

**Next Action**: Start with Proposal 1.2 (Prefetch) - see [`L1D_OPTIMIZATION_QUICK_START_GUIDE.md`](L1D_OPTIMIZATION_QUICK_START_GUIDE.md) § Phase 1, Step 1.1

**Good luck!** 🚀 Expecting +36-49% gain within 1-2 days of focused implementation.