# ChatGPT Pro Response: mmap vs malloc Strategy **Date**: 2025-10-21 **Response Time**: ~2 minutes **Model**: GPT-5 (via codex) **Status**: โœ… Clear recommendation received --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ **Final Recommendation: GO with Option A** **Decision**: Switch `POLICY_LARGE_INFREQUENT` to `mmap` with kill-switch guard. --- ## โœ… **Why Option A** 1. **Phase 6.3 requires mmap**: `madvise` is a no-op on `malloc` blocks 2. **BigCache absorbs risk**: 90% hit rate โ†’ only 10% hit OS (1538 โ†’ 150 faults) 3. **mimalloc's secret**: "keep mapping, lazily reclaim" with MADV_FREE/DONTNEED 4. **Immediate unlock**: Phase 6.3 works immediately --- ## ๐Ÿ”ฅ **CRITICAL BUG DISCOVERED in Current Code** **Problem in `hakmem.c:543`**: ```c case ALLOC_METHOD_MMAP: if (hdr->size >= BATCH_MIN_SIZE) { hak_batch_add(raw, hdr->size); // Add to batch } munmap(raw, hdr->size); // โ† BUG! Immediately unmaps break; ``` **Why this is wrong**: - Calls `munmap` immediately after adding to batch - **Negates Phase 6.3 benefit**: batch cannot coalesce/defray TLB work - TLB flush happens on `munmap`, not on `madvise` --- ## โœ… **Correct Implementation** ### Free Path Logic (Choose ONE): **Option 1: Cache in BigCache** ```c // Try BigCache first if (hak_bigcache_try_insert(ptr, size, site_id)) { // Cached! Do NOT munmap // Optionally: madvise(MADV_FREE) on insert or eviction return; } ``` **Option 2: Batch for delayed reclaim** ```c // BigCache full, add to batch if (size >= BATCH_MIN_SIZE) { hak_batch_add(raw, size); // Do NOT munmap here! // munmap happens on batch flush (coalesced) return; } ``` **Option 3: Immediate unmap (last resort)** ```c // Cold eviction only munmap(raw, size); ``` --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ **Implementation Plan** ### Phase 1: Minimal Change (1-line) **File**: `hakmem.c:357` ```c case POLICY_LARGE_INFREQUENT: return alloc_mmap(size); // Changed from alloc_malloc ``` **Guard with kill-switch**: ```c #ifdef HAKO_HAKMEM_LARGE_MMAP return alloc_mmap(size); #else return alloc_malloc(size); // Safe fallback #endif ``` **Env variable**: `HAKO_HAKMEM_LARGE_MMAP=1` (default OFF) ### Phase 2: Fix Free Path **File**: `hakmem.c:543-548` **Current (WRONG)**: ```c case ALLOC_METHOD_MMAP: if (hdr->size >= BATCH_MIN_SIZE) { hak_batch_add(raw, hdr->size); } munmap(raw, hdr->size); // โ† Remove this! break; ``` **Correct**: ```c case ALLOC_METHOD_MMAP: // Try BigCache first if (hdr->size >= 1048576) { // 1MB threshold if (hak_bigcache_try_insert(user_ptr, hdr->size, site_id)) { // Cached, skip munmap return; } } // BigCache full, add to batch if (hdr->size >= BATCH_MIN_SIZE) { hak_batch_add(raw, hdr->size); // munmap deferred to batch flush return; } // Small or batch disabled, immediate unmap munmap(raw, hdr->size); break; ``` ### Phase 3: Batch Flush Implementation **File**: `hakmem_batch.c` ```c void hak_batch_flush(void) { if (batch_count == 0) return; // Use MADV_FREE (prefer) or MADV_DONTNEED (fallback) for (size_t i = 0; i < batch_count; i++) { #ifdef __linux__ madvise(batch[i].ptr, batch[i].size, MADV_FREE); #else madvise(batch[i].ptr, batch[i].size, MADV_DONTNEED); #endif } // Optional: munmap on cold eviction // (Keep VA mapped for reuse in most cases) batch_count = 0; } ``` --- ## ๐Ÿ“Š **Expected Performance Gains** ### Metrics Prediction: | Metric | Current (malloc) | With Option A (mmap) | Improvement | |--------|------------------|----------------------|-------------| | **Page faults** | 513 | **120-180** | 65-77% fewer | | **TLB shootdowns** | ~150 | **3-8** | 95% fewer | | **Latency (VM)** | 36,647 ns | **24,000-28,000 ns** | **30-45% faster** | ### Success Criteria: - โœ… Page faults: 120-180 (vs 513 current) - โœ… Batch flushes: 3-8 per run - โœ… Latency: 25-28 ยตs (vs 36.6 ยตs current) ### Rollback Criteria: - โŒ Page faults > 500 (BigCache failing) - โŒ Latency regression (slower than 36,647 ns) --- ## ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ **Risk Mitigation** ### 1. Kill-Switch Guard ```c // Compile-time or runtime flag HAKO_HAKMEM_LARGE_MMAP=1 // Enable mmap path ``` ### 2. BigCache Hard Cap - Limit: 64-256 MB (1-2ร— working set) - LRU eviction to batched reclaim ### 3. Prefer MADV_FREE - Lower TLB cost than MADV_DONTNEED - Better performance on quick reuse - Linux: `MADV_FREE`, macOS: `MADV_FREE_REUSABLE` ### 4. Observability (Add Counters) - mmap allocation count - BigCache hits/misses for mmap - Batch flush count - munmap count - Sample `minflt/majflt` before/after --- ## ๐Ÿงช **Test Plan** ### Step 1: Enable mmap with guard ```bash # Makefile CFLAGS += -DHAKO_HAKMEM_LARGE_MMAP=1 ``` ### Step 2: Run VM scenario benchmark ```bash # 10 runs, measure: make bench_vm RUNS=10 ``` ### Step 3: Collect metrics - BigCache hit% for mmap - Page faults (expect 120-180) - Batch flushes (expect 3-8) - Latency (expect 24-28 ยตs) ### Step 4: Validate or rollback ```bash # If page faults > 500 or latency regresses: CFLAGS += -UHAKO_HAKMEM_LARGE_MMAP # Rollback ``` --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ **BigCache + mmap Compatibility** **ChatGPT Pro confirms: SAFE** - โœ… mmap blocks can be cached (same as malloc semantics) - โœ… Content unspecified (matches malloc) - โœ… Reusable after `MADV_FREE` **Required changes**: 1. **Allocation**: `hak_bigcache_try_get` serves mmap blocks 2. **Free**: Try BigCache insert first, skip `munmap` if cached 3. **Header**: Keep `ALLOC_METHOD_MMAP` on cached blocks --- ## ๐Ÿ† **mimalloc's Secret Revealed** **How mimalloc wins on VM scenario**: 1. **Keep VA mapped**: Don't `munmap` immediately 2. **Lazy reclaim**: Use `MADV_FREE`/`REUSABLE` 3. **Batch TLB work**: Coalesce reclamation 4. **Per-segment reuse**: Cache large blocks **Our Option A emulates this**: BigCache + mmap + MADV_FREE + batching --- ## ๐Ÿ“‹ **Action Items** ### Immediate (Phase 1): - [ ] Add kill-switch guard (`HAKO_HAKMEM_LARGE_MMAP`) - [ ] Change line 357: `return alloc_mmap(size);` - [ ] Test compile ### Critical (Phase 2): - [ ] Fix free path (remove immediate `munmap`) - [ ] Implement BigCache insert check - [ ] Defer `munmap` to batch flush ### Optimization (Phase 3): - [ ] Switch to `MADV_FREE` (Linux) - [ ] Add observability counters - [ ] Implement BigCache hard cap (64-256 MB) ### Validation: - [ ] Run VM scenario (10 runs) - [ ] Verify page faults < 200 - [ ] Verify latency 24-28 ยตs - [ ] Rollback if metrics fail --- ## ๐ŸŽฏ **Alternative: Option C (ELO)** **If Option A fails**: - Extend ELO action space: malloc vs mmap dimension - Doubles ELO arms (12 โ†’ 24 strategies) - Slower convergence, more complex **ChatGPT Pro says**: "Overkill right now. Ship Option A with kill-switch first." --- ## ๐Ÿ“Š **Summary** **Decision**: โœ… GO with Option A (mmap + kill-switch) **Critical Fix**: Remove immediate `munmap` in free path **Expected Gain**: 30-45% improvement on VM scenario (36.6 โ†’ 24-28 ยตs) **Next Steps**: 1. Implement Phase 1 (1-line change + guard) 2. Fix Phase 2 (free path) 3. Run VM benchmark 4. Validate or rollback **Confidence**: HIGH (based on BigCache's 90% hit rate + mimalloc analysis) --- **Generated**: 2025-10-21 by ChatGPT-5 (via codex exec) **Status**: Ready for implementation **Priority**: P0 (unlocks Phase 6.3)