|
|
03df05ec75
|
Phase 12: Shared SuperSlab Pool implementation (WIP - runtime crash)
## Summary
Implemented Phase 12 Shared SuperSlab Pool (mimalloc-style) to address
SuperSlab allocation churn (877 SuperSlabs → 100-200 target).
## Implementation (ChatGPT + Claude)
1. **Metadata changes** (superslab_types.h):
- Added class_idx to TinySlabMeta (per-slab dynamic class)
- Removed size_class from SuperSlab (no longer per-SuperSlab)
- Changed owner_tid (16-bit) → owner_tid_low (8-bit)
2. **Shared Pool** (hakmem_shared_pool.{h,c}):
- Global pool shared by all size classes
- shared_pool_acquire_slab() - Get free slab for class_idx
- shared_pool_release_slab() - Return slab when empty
- Per-class hints for fast path optimization
3. **Integration** (23 files modified):
- Updated all ss->size_class → meta->class_idx
- Updated all meta->owner_tid → meta->owner_tid_low
- superslab_refill() now uses shared pool
- Free path releases empty slabs back to pool
4. **Build system** (Makefile):
- Added hakmem_shared_pool.o to OBJS_BASE and TINY_BENCH_OBJS_BASE
## Status: ⚠️ Build OK, Runtime CRASH
**Build**: ✅ SUCCESS
- All 23 files compile without errors
- Only warnings: superslab_allocate type mismatch (legacy code)
**Runtime**: ❌ SEGFAULT
- Crash location: sll_refill_small_from_ss()
- Exit code: 139 (SIGSEGV)
- Test case: ./bench_random_mixed_hakmem 1000 256 42
## Known Issues
1. **SEGFAULT in refill path** - Likely shared_pool_acquire_slab() issue
2. **Legacy superslab_allocate()** still exists (type mismatch warning)
3. **Remaining TODOs** from design doc:
- SuperSlab physical layout integration
- slab_handle.h cleanup
- Remove old per-class head implementation
## Next Steps
1. Debug SEGFAULT (gdb backtrace shows sll_refill_small_from_ss)
2. Fix shared_pool_acquire_slab() or superslab_init_slab()
3. Basic functionality test (1K → 100K iterations)
4. Measure SuperSlab count reduction (877 → 100-200)
5. Performance benchmark (+650-860% expected)
## Files Changed (25 files)
core/box/free_local_box.c
core/box/free_remote_box.c
core/box/front_gate_classifier.c
core/hakmem_super_registry.c
core/hakmem_tiny.c
core/hakmem_tiny_bg_spill.c
core/hakmem_tiny_free.inc
core/hakmem_tiny_lifecycle.inc
core/hakmem_tiny_magazine.c
core/hakmem_tiny_query.c
core/hakmem_tiny_refill.inc.h
core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c
core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.h
core/hakmem_tiny_tls_ops.h
core/slab_handle.h
core/superslab/superslab_inline.h
core/superslab/superslab_types.h
core/tiny_debug.h
core/tiny_free_fast.inc.h
core/tiny_free_magazine.inc.h
core/tiny_remote.c
core/tiny_superslab_alloc.inc.h
core/tiny_superslab_free.inc.h
Makefile
## New Files (3 files)
PHASE12_SHARED_SUPERSLAB_POOL_DESIGN.md
core/hakmem_shared_pool.c
core/hakmem_shared_pool.h
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: ChatGPT <chatgpt@openai.com>
|
2025-11-13 16:33:03 +09:00 |
|
|
|
1da8754d45
|
CRITICAL FIX: TLS 未初期化による 4T SEGV を完全解消
**問題:**
- Larson 4T で 100% SEGV (1T は 2.09M ops/s で完走)
- System/mimalloc は 4T で 33.52M ops/s 正常動作
- SS OFF + Remote OFF でも 4T で SEGV
**根本原因: (Task agent ultrathink 調査結果)**
```
CRASH: mov (%r15),%r13
R15 = 0x6261 ← ASCII "ba" (ゴミ値、未初期化TLS)
```
Worker スレッドの TLS 変数が未初期化:
- `__thread void* g_tls_sll_head[TINY_NUM_CLASSES];` ← 初期化なし
- pthread_create() で生成されたスレッドでゼロ初期化されない
- NULL チェックが通過 (0x6261 != NULL) → dereference → SEGV
**修正内容:**
全 TLS 配列に明示的初期化子 `= {0}` を追加:
1. **core/hakmem_tiny.c:**
- `g_tls_sll_head[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
- `g_tls_sll_count[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
- `g_tls_live_ss[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
- `g_tls_bcur[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
- `g_tls_bend[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
2. **core/tiny_fastcache.c:**
- `g_tiny_fast_cache[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
- `g_tiny_fast_count[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
- `g_tiny_fast_free_head[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
- `g_tiny_fast_free_count[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
3. **core/hakmem_tiny_magazine.c:**
- `g_tls_mags[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
4. **core/tiny_sticky.c:**
- `g_tls_sticky_ss[TINY_NUM_CLASSES][TINY_STICKY_RING] = {0}`
- `g_tls_sticky_idx[TINY_NUM_CLASSES][TINY_STICKY_RING] = {0}`
- `g_tls_sticky_pos[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
**効果:**
```
Before: 1T: 2.09M ✅ | 4T: SEGV 💀
After: 1T: 2.41M ✅ | 4T: 4.19M ✅ (+15% 1T, SEGV解消)
```
**テスト:**
```bash
# 1 thread: 完走
./larson_hakmem 2 8 128 1024 1 12345 1
→ Throughput = 2,407,597 ops/s ✅
# 4 threads: 完走（以前は SEGV）
./larson_hakmem 2 8 128 1024 1 12345 4
→ Throughput = 4,192,155 ops/s ✅
```
**調査協力:** Task agent (ultrathink mode) による完璧な根本原因特定
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2025-11-07 01:27:04 +09:00 |
|
