|
|
2be754853f
|
Phase 11: SuperSlab Prewarm implementation (startup pre-allocation)
## Summary
Pre-allocate SuperSlabs at startup to eliminate runtime mmap overhead.
Result: +6.4% improvement (8.82M → 9.38M ops/s) but still 9x slower than System malloc.
## Key Findings (Lesson Learned)
- Syscall reduction strategy targeted WRONG bottleneck
- Real bottleneck: SuperSlab allocation churn (877 SuperSlabs needed)
- Prewarm reduces mmap frequency but doesn't solve fundamental architecture issue
## Implementation
- Two-phase allocation with atomic bypass flag
- Environment variable: HAKMEM_PREWARM_SUPERSLABS (default: 0)
- Best result: Prewarm=8 → 9.38M ops/s (+6.4%)
## Next Step
Pivot to Phase 12: Shared SuperSlab Pool (mimalloc-style)
- Expected: 877 → 100-200 SuperSlabs (-70-80%)
- This addresses ROOT CAUSE (allocation churn) not symptoms
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
2025-11-13 14:45:43 +09:00 |
|
