tomoaki/hakmem
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
207 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
d355041638d0b77d0bf2f8b4928e8201dbd52f95
Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Moe Charm (CI)
131cdb7b88 Doc: Add benchmark reports, atomic freelist docs, and .gitignore update 
Phase 1 Commit: Comprehensive documentation and build system cleanup

Added Documentation:
- BENCHMARK_SUMMARY_20251122.md: Current performance baseline
- COMPREHENSIVE_BENCHMARK_REPORT_20251122.md: Detailed analysis
- LARSON_SLOWDOWN_INVESTIGATION_REPORT.md: Larson benchmark deep dive
- ATOMIC_FREELIST_*.md (5 files): Complete atomic freelist documentation
  - Implementation strategy, quick start, site-by-site guide
  - Index and summary for easy navigation

Added Scripts:
- run_comprehensive_benchmark.sh: Automated benchmark runner
- scripts/analyze_freelist_sites.sh: Freelist analysis tool
- scripts/verify_atomic_freelist_conversion.sh: Conversion verification

Build System:
- Updated .gitignore: Added *.d (build dependency files)
- Cleaned up tracked .d files (will be ignored going forward)

Performance Status (2025-11-22):
- Random Mixed 256B: 59.6M ops/s (VERIFIED WORKING)
- Benchmark command: ./out/release/bench_random_mixed_hakmem 10000000 256 42
- Known issue: workset=8192 causes SEGV (to be fixed separately)

Notes:
- bench_random_mixed.c already tracked, working state confirmed
- Ultra SLIM implementation backed up to /tmp/ (Phase 2 restore pending)
- Documentation covers atomic freelist conversion and benchmarking methodology

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-11-22 06:11:55 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
7975e243ee Phase 7 Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (+180-280% improvement!) 
MAJOR SUCCESS: HAKMEM now achieves 85-92% of System malloc on tiny
allocations (128-512B) and BEATS System at 146% on 1024B allocations!

Performance Results:
- Random Mixed 128B: 21M → 59M ops/s (+181%) 🚀
- Random Mixed 256B: 19M → 70M ops/s (+268%) 🚀
- Random Mixed 512B: 21M → 68M ops/s (+224%) 🚀
- Random Mixed 1024B: 21M → 65M ops/s (+210%, 146% of System!) 🏆
- Larson 1T: 2.68M ops/s (stable, no regression)

Implementation:
1. Task 3a: Remove profiling overhead in release builds
   - Wrapped RDTSC calls in #if !HAKMEM_BUILD_RELEASE
   - Compiler can eliminate profiling code completely
   - Effect: +2% (2.68M → 2.73M Larson)

2. Task 3b: Simplify refill logic
   - Use constants from hakmem_build_flags.h
   - TLS cache already optimal
   - Effect: No regression

3. Task 3c: Pre-warm TLS cache (GAME CHANGER!)
   - Pre-allocate 16 blocks per class at init
   - Eliminates cold-start penalty
   - Effect: +180-280% improvement 🚀

Root Cause:
The bottleneck was cold-start, not the hot path! First allocation in
each class triggered a SuperSlab refill (100+ cycles). Pre-warming
eliminated this penalty, revealing Phase 7's true potential.

Files Modified:
- core/hakmem_tiny.c: Pre-warm function implementation
- core/box/hak_core_init.inc.h: Pre-warm initialization call
- core/tiny_alloc_fast.inc.h: Profiling overhead removal
- core/hakmem_phase7_config.h: Task 3 constants (NEW)
- core/hakmem_build_flags.h: Phase 7 feature flags
- Makefile: PREWARM_TLS flag, phase7 targets
- CLAUDE.md: Phase 7 success summary
- PHASE7_TASK3_RESULTS.md: Comprehensive results report (NEW)

Build:
make HEADER_CLASSIDX=1 AGGRESSIVE_INLINE=1 PREWARM_TLS=1 phase7-bench

🎉 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-11-08 12:54:52 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
382980d450 Phase 6-2.4: Fix SuperSlab free SEGV: remove guess loop and add memory readability check; add registry atomic consistency (base as _Atomic uintptr_t with acq/rel); add debug toggles (SUPER_REG_DEBUG/REQTRACE); update CURRENT_TASK with results and next steps; capture suite results. 2025-11-07 18:07:48 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
8f3095fb85 CI-safe debug runners: add ASan LD_PRELOAD + UBSan mailbox targets; add asan_preload script; document sanitizer-safe workflows and results in CURRENT_TASK.md (debug complete). 2025-11-07 12:09:28 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
1da8754d45 CRITICAL FIX: TLS 未初期化による 4T SEGV を完全解消 
**問題:**
- Larson 4T で 100% SEGV (1T は 2.09M ops/s で完走)
- System/mimalloc は 4T で 33.52M ops/s 正常動作
- SS OFF + Remote OFF でも 4T で SEGV

**根本原因: (Task agent ultrathink 調査結果)**
```
CRASH: mov (%r15),%r13
R15 = 0x6261  ← ASCII "ba" (ゴミ値、未初期化TLS)
```

Worker スレッドの TLS 変数が未初期化:
- `__thread void* g_tls_sll_head[TINY_NUM_CLASSES];`  ← 初期化なし
- pthread_create() で生成されたスレッドでゼロ初期化されない
- NULL チェックが通過 (0x6261 != NULL) → dereference → SEGV

**修正内容:**
全 TLS 配列に明示的初期化子 `= {0}` を追加:

1. **core/hakmem_tiny.c:**
   - `g_tls_sll_head[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
   - `g_tls_sll_count[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
   - `g_tls_live_ss[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
   - `g_tls_bcur[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`
   - `g_tls_bend[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`

2. **core/tiny_fastcache.c:**
   - `g_tiny_fast_cache[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
   - `g_tiny_fast_count[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
   - `g_tiny_fast_free_head[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`
   - `g_tiny_fast_free_count[TINY_FAST_CLASS_COUNT] = {0}`

3. **core/hakmem_tiny_magazine.c:**
   - `g_tls_mags[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`

4. **core/tiny_sticky.c:**
   - `g_tls_sticky_ss[TINY_NUM_CLASSES][TINY_STICKY_RING] = {0}`
   - `g_tls_sticky_idx[TINY_NUM_CLASSES][TINY_STICKY_RING] = {0}`
   - `g_tls_sticky_pos[TINY_NUM_CLASSES] = {0}`

**効果:**
```
Before: 1T: 2.09M ✅  |  4T: SEGV 💀
After:  1T: 2.41M ✅  |  4T: 4.19M ✅  (+15% 1T, SEGV解消)
```

**テスト:**
```bash
# 1 thread: 完走
./larson_hakmem 2 8 128 1024 1 12345 1
→ Throughput = 2,407,597 ops/s ✅

# 4 threads: 完走（以前は SEGV）
./larson_hakmem 2 8 128 1024 1 12345 4
→ Throughput = 4,192,155 ops/s ✅
```

**調査協力:** Task agent (ultrathink mode) による完璧な根本原因特定

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-11-07 01:27:04 +09:00
Claude
f0c87d0cac Add Larson performance analysis and optimized profile 
Ultrathink analysis reveals root cause of 4x performance gap:

Key Findings:
- Single-thread: HAKMEM 0.46M ops/s vs system 4.29M ops/s (10.7%)
- Multi-thread: HAKMEM 1.81M ops/s vs system 7.23M ops/s (25.0%)
- Root cause: malloc() entry point has 8+ branch checks
- Bottleneck: Fast Path is structurally complex vs system tcache

Files Added:
- LARSON_PERFORMANCE_ANALYSIS_2025_11_05.md: Detailed analysis with 3 optimization strategies
- scripts/profiles/tinyhot_optimized.env: CLAUDE.md-based optimized config

Proposed Solutions:
- Option A: Optimize malloc() guard checks (+200-400% expected)
- Option B: Improve refill efficiency (+30-50% expected)
- Option C: Complete Fast Path simplification (+400-800% expected)

Target: Achieve 60-80% of system malloc performance
 2025-11-05 04:03:10 +00:00
Moe Charm (CI)
52386401b3 Debug Counters Implementation - Clean History 
Major Features:
- Debug counter infrastructure for Refill Stage tracking
- Free Pipeline counters (ss_local, ss_remote, tls_sll)
- Diagnostic counters for early return analysis
- Unified larson.sh benchmark runner with profiles
- Phase 6-3 regression analysis documentation

Bug Fixes:
- Fix SuperSlab disabled by default (HAKMEM_TINY_USE_SUPERSLAB)
- Fix profile variable naming consistency
- Add .gitignore patterns for large files

Performance:
- Phase 6-3: 4.79 M ops/s (has OOM risk)
- With SuperSlab: 3.13 M ops/s (+19% improvement)

This is a clean repository without large log files.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00