tomoaki/hakmem
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
665 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
2013514f7b58fb4dc56dcca99f6823f58f4b3131
Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Moe Charm (CI)
2013514f7b Working state before pushing to cyu remote 2025-12-19 03:45:01 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
89a9212700 Phase 83-1 + Allocator Comparison: Switch dispatch fixed (NO-GO +0.32%), PROFILE correction, SCORECARD update 
Key changes:
- Phase 83-1: Switch dispatch fixed mode (tiny_inline_slots_switch_dispatch_fixed_box) - NO-GO (marginal +0.32%, branch reduction negligible)
  Reason: lazy-init pattern already optimal, Phase 78-1 pattern shows diminishing returns

- Allocator comparison baseline update (10-run SSOT, WS=400, ITERS=20M):
  tcmalloc: 115.26M (92.33% of mimalloc)
  jemalloc: 97.39M (77.96% of mimalloc)
  system: 85.20M (68.24% of mimalloc)
  mimalloc: 124.82M (baseline)

- hakmem PROFILE correction: scripts/run_mixed_10_cleanenv.sh + run_allocator_quick_matrix.sh
  PROFILE explicitly set to MIXED_TINYV3_C7_SAFE for hakmem measurements
  Result: baseline stabilized to 55.53M (44.46% of mimalloc)
  Previous unstable measurement (35.57M) was due to profile leak

- Documentation:
  * PERFORMANCE_TARGETS_SCORECARD.md: Reference allocators + M1/M2 milestone status
  * PHASE83_1_SWITCH_DISPATCH_FIXED_RESULTS.md: Phase 83-1 analysis (NO-GO)
  * ALLOCATOR_COMPARISON_QUICK_RUNBOOK.md: Quick comparison procedure
  * ALLOCATOR_COMPARISON_SSOT.md: Detailed SSOT methodology

- M2 milestone status: 44.46% (target 55%, gap -10.54pp) - structural improvements needed

🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-18 18:50:00 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
d0cf0d6436 docs: tone down Phase 75-5 PGO recovery estimates 2025-12-18 09:37:55 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
3dbf4acb48 Update scorecard: Phase 75-4 FAST PGO rebase (+3.16%) + critical PGO staleness finding 
Phase 75-4 validates C5+C6 inline slots on FAST PGO baseline:
- Point A (baseline, C5=0, C6=0): 53.81 M ops/s
- Point D (C5=1, C6=1): 55.51 M ops/s (+3.16%)

CRITICAL FINDING: 14% regression vs Phase 69 baseline (53.81 vs 62.63 M ops/s)
Root cause: Stale PGO profile (likely trained pre-Phase 69, missing Phase 75 benefits)

Recommended next: Phase 75-5 (PGO Profile Regeneration) to recover lost performance

Scorecard updated with Phase 75-4 results and high-priority action items.
 2025-12-18 09:28:09 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
e9fad41154 docs: clarify Phase 75 vs FAST PGO SSOT 2025-12-18 09:11:56 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
e9b97e9d8e Phase 74-1/74-2: UnifiedCache LOCALIZE optimization (P1 frozen, NEUTRAL -0.87%) 
Phase 74-1 (ENV-gated LOCALIZE):
- Result: +0.50% (NEUTRAL)
- Runtime branch overhead caused instructions/branches to increase
- Diagnosed: Branch tax dominates intended optimization

Phase 74-2 (compile-time LOCALIZE):
- Result: -0.87% (NEUTRAL, P1 frozen)
- Removed runtime branch → instructions -0.6%, branches -2.3% ✓
- But cache-misses +86% (register pressure/spill) → net loss
- Conclusion: LOCALIZE本体 works, but fragile to cache effects

Key finding:
- Dependency chain reduction (LOCALIZE) has low ROI due to cache-miss sensitivity
- P1 (LOCALIZE) frozen at default OFF
- Next: Phase 74-3 (P0: FASTAPI) - move branches outside hot loop

Files:
- core/hakmem_build_flags.h: HAKMEM_TINY_UC_LOCALIZE_COMPILED flag
- core/box/tiny_unified_cache_hitpath_env_box.h: ENV gate (frozen)
- core/front/tiny_unified_cache.h: compile-time #if blocks
- docs/analysis/PHASE74_*: Design, instructions, results
- CURRENT_TASK.md: P1 frozen, P0 next instructions

Also includes:
- Phase 69 refill tuning results (archived docs)
- PERFORMANCE_TARGETS_SCORECARD.md: Phase 69 baseline update
- PHASE70_REFILL_OBSERVABILITY_PREREQS_SSOT.md: Route banner docs

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-18 07:47:44 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
b6212bbe31 Phase 69: Refill tuning completion (Warm Pool Size=16 optimized) 
- Promoted Warm Pool Size=16 as the new baseline (+3.26% gain).
- Updated PERFORMANCE_TARGETS_SCORECARD.md with Phase 69 results.
- Updated scripts/run_mixed_10_cleanenv.sh and core/bench_profile.h to use HAKMEM_WARM_POOL_SIZE=16 by default.
- Clarified that TINY_REFILL_BATCH_SIZE is not currently connected.
 2025-12-18 01:55:27 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
84f5034e45 Phase 68: PGO training set diversification (seed/WS expansion) 
Changes:
- scripts/box/pgo_fast_profile_config.sh: Expanded WS patterns (3→5) and seeds (1→3)
  for reduced overfitting and better production workload representativeness
- PERFORMANCE_TARGETS_SCORECARD.md: Phase 68 baseline promoted (61.614M = 50.93%)
- CURRENT_TASK.md: Phase 68 marked complete, Phase 67a (layout tax forensics) set Active

Results:
- 10-run verification: +1.19% vs Phase 66 baseline (GO, >+1.0% threshold)
- M1 milestone: 50.93% of mimalloc (target 50%, exceeded by +0.93pp)
- Stability: 10-run mean/median with <2.1% CV

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-17 21:08:17 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
ef8e2ab9b5 Phase 59b & 61: Speed-first Rebase + C7 ULTRA Header-Light Optimization 
Phase 59b: Speed-first Mode Baseline Rebase
- Rebase on MIXED_TINYV3_C7_SAFE profile (Speed-first, no prewarm suppression)
- hakmem: 58.478 M ops/s (CV 2.52%)
- mimalloc: 120.979 M ops/s (CV 0.90%)
- Ratio: 48.34% of mimalloc (down from 49.13% Balanced mode in Phase 59)
- Reason for difference: Profile selection (Speed-first vs Balanced) and mimalloc environment variance
- Status: COMPLETE (measurement-only, zero code changes)

Phase 61: C7 ULTRA Header-Light Optimization Attempt
- Objective: Skip header write on C7 ULTRA alloc hit (write only on refill)
- Implementation: ENV gate HAKMEM_TINY_C7_ULTRA_HEADER_LIGHT (default OFF)
- Result: +0.31% (NEUTRAL, below +1.0% GO threshold)
  - Baseline: 59.543 M ops/s (CV 1.53%)
  - Treatment: 59.729 M ops/s (CV 2.66%)
- Root cause analysis:
  - tiny_region_id_write_header only 2.32% of time (lower than Phase 42 estimate 4.56%)
  - Header-light mode adds branch to hot path, negating write savings
  - Mixed workload dilutes C7-specific optimization effectiveness
  - Variance increased due to branch prediction variability
- Decision: Kept as research box with ENV gate (default OFF)
- Lesson: Workload-specific optimizations need careful verification with full workloads

Updated Documentation:
- PHASE59B_SPEED_FIRST_REBASE_RESULTS.md: Full measurement results and analysis
- PHASE61_C7_ULTRA_HEADER_LIGHT_RESULTS.md: A/B test results and root cause analysis
- PHASE61_C7_ULTRA_HEADER_LIGHT_IMPLEMENTATION.md: Implementation details and design
- CURRENT_TASK.md: Updated status and next phase planning (Phase 62)
- PERFORMANCE_TARGETS_SCORECARD.md: Updated baseline and M1 milestone status

M1 (50%) Milestone Status:
- Current: 48.34% (Speed-first profile)
- Gap: -1.66% (within measurement noise)
- Profile recommendation: Speed-first as canonical default for throughput focus

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-17 16:25:26 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
7adbcdfcb6 Phase 54-60: Memory-Lean mode, Balanced mode stabilization, M1 (50%) achievement 
## Summary

Completed Phase 54-60 optimization work:

**Phase 54-56: Memory-Lean mode (LEAN+OFF prewarm suppression)**
- Implemented ss_mem_lean_env_box.h with ENV gates
- Balanced mode (LEAN+OFF) promoted as production default
- Result: +1.2% throughput, better stability, zero syscall overhead
- Added to bench_profile.h: MIXED_TINYV3_C7_BALANCED preset

**Phase 57: 60-min soak finalization**
- Balanced mode: 60-min soak, RSS drift 0%, CV 5.38%
- Speed-first mode: 60-min soak, RSS drift 0%, CV 1.58%
- Syscall budget: 1.25e-7/op (800× under target)
- Status: PRODUCTION-READY

**Phase 59: 50% recovery baseline rebase**
- hakmem FAST (Balanced): 59.184M ops/s, CV 1.31%
- mimalloc: 120.466M ops/s, CV 3.50%
- Ratio: 49.13% (M1 ACHIEVED within statistical noise)
- Superior stability: 2.68× better CV than mimalloc

**Phase 60: Alloc pass-down SSOT (NO-GO)**
- Implemented alloc_passdown_ssot_env_box.h
- Modified malloc_tiny_fast.h for SSOT pattern
- Result: -0.46% (NO-GO)
- Key lesson: SSOT not applicable where early-exit already optimized

## Key Metrics

- Performance: 49.13% of mimalloc (M1 effectively achieved)
- Stability: CV 1.31% (superior to mimalloc 3.50%)
- Syscall budget: 1.25e-7/op (excellent)
- RSS: 33MB stable, 0% drift over 60 minutes

## Files Added/Modified

New boxes:
- core/box/ss_mem_lean_env_box.h
- core/box/ss_release_policy_box.{h,c}
- core/box/alloc_passdown_ssot_env_box.h

Scripts:
- scripts/soak_mixed_single_process.sh
- scripts/analyze_epoch_tail_csv.py
- scripts/soak_mixed_rss.sh
- scripts/calculate_percentiles.py
- scripts/analyze_soak.py

Documentation: Phase 40-60 analysis documents

## Design Decisions

1. Profile separation (core/bench_profile.h):
   - MIXED_TINYV3_C7_SAFE: Speed-first (no LEAN)
   - MIXED_TINYV3_C7_BALANCED: Balanced mode (LEAN+OFF)

2. Box Theory compliance:
   - All ENV gates reversible (HAKMEM_SS_MEM_LEAN, HAKMEM_ALLOC_PASSDOWN_SSOT)
   - Single conversion points maintained
   - No physical deletions (compile-out only)

3. Lessons learned:
   - SSOT effective only where redundancy exists (Phase 60 showed limits)
   - Branch prediction extremely effective (~0 cycles for well-predicted branches)
   - Early-exit pattern valuable even when seemingly redundant

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-17 06:24:01 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
b7085c47e1 Phase 35-39: FAST build optimization complete (+7.13% cumulative) 
Phase 35-A: BENCH_MINIMAL gate function elimination (GO +4.39%)
- tiny_front_v3_enabled() → constant true
- tiny_metadata_cache_enabled() → constant 0
- learner_v7_enabled() → constant false
- small_learner_v2_enabled() → constant false

Phase 36: Policy snapshot init-once (GO +0.71%)
- small_policy_v7_snapshot() version check skip in BENCH_MINIMAL
- TLS cache for policy snapshot

Phase 37: Standard TLS cache (NO-GO -0.07%)
- TLS cache for Standard build attempted
- Runtime gate overhead negates benefit

Phase 38: FAST/OBSERVE/Standard workflow established
- make perf_fast, make perf_observe targets
- Scorecard and documentation updates

Phase 39: Hot path gate constantization (GO +1.98%)
- front_gate_unified_enabled() → constant 1
- alloc_dualhot_enabled() → constant 0
- g_bench_fast_front, g_v3_enabled blocks → compile-out
- free_dispatch_stats_enabled() → constant false

Results:
- FAST v3: 56.04M ops/s (47.4% of mimalloc)
- Standard: 53.50M ops/s (45.3% of mimalloc)
- M1 target (50%): 5.5% remaining

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-16 15:01:56 +09:00
Moe Charm (CI)
8052e8b320 Phase 24-26: Hot path atomic telemetry prune (+2.00% cumulative) 
Summary:
- Phase 24 (alloc stats): +0.93% GO
- Phase 25 (free stats): +1.07% GO
- Phase 26 (diagnostics): -0.33% NEUTRAL (code cleanliness)
- Total: 11 atomics compiled-out, +2.00% improvement

Phase 24: OBSERVE tax prune (tiny_class_stats_box.h)
- Added HAKMEM_TINY_CLASS_STATS_COMPILED (default: 0)
- Wrapped 5 stats functions: uc_miss, warm_hit, shared_lock, tls_carve_*
- Result: +0.93% (baseline 56.675M vs compiled-in 56.151M ops/s)

Phase 25: Tiny free stats prune (tiny_superslab_free.inc.h)
- Added HAKMEM_TINY_FREE_STATS_COMPILED (default: 0)
- Wrapped g_free_ss_enter atomic in free hot path
- Result: +1.07% (baseline 57.017M vs compiled-in 56.415M ops/s)

Phase 26: Hot path diagnostic atomics prune
- Added 5 compile gates for low-frequency error counters:
  - HAKMEM_TINY_C7_FREE_COUNT_COMPILED
  - HAKMEM_TINY_HDR_MISMATCH_LOG_COMPILED
  - HAKMEM_TINY_HDR_META_MISMATCH_COMPILED
  - HAKMEM_TINY_METRIC_BAD_CLASS_COMPILED
  - HAKMEM_TINY_HDR_META_FAST_COMPILED
- Result: -0.33% NEUTRAL (within noise, kept for cleanliness)

Alignment with mimalloc principles:
- "No atomics on hot path" - telemetry moved to compile-time opt-in
- Fixed per-op tax elimination
- Production builds: maximum performance (atomics compiled-out)
- Research builds: full diagnostics (COMPILED=1)

Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.com/claude-code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2025-12-16 05:35:11 +09:00