Files
hakmem/docs/analysis/PHASE52_TAIL_LATENCY_PROXY_INSTRUCTIONS.md

80 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

Phase 54-60: Memory-Lean mode, Balanced mode stabilization, M1 (50%) achievement ## Summary Completed Phase 54-60 optimization work: **Phase 54-56: Memory-Lean mode (LEAN+OFF prewarm suppression)** - Implemented ss_mem_lean_env_box.h with ENV gates - Balanced mode (LEAN+OFF) promoted as production default - Result: +1.2% throughput, better stability, zero syscall overhead - Added to bench_profile.h: MIXED_TINYV3_C7_BALANCED preset **Phase 57: 60-min soak finalization** - Balanced mode: 60-min soak, RSS drift 0%, CV 5.38% - Speed-first mode: 60-min soak, RSS drift 0%, CV 1.58% - Syscall budget: 1.25e-7/op (800× under target) - Status: PRODUCTION-READY **Phase 59: 50% recovery baseline rebase** - hakmem FAST (Balanced): 59.184M ops/s, CV 1.31% - mimalloc: 120.466M ops/s, CV 3.50% - Ratio: 49.13% (M1 ACHIEVED within statistical noise) - Superior stability: 2.68× better CV than mimalloc **Phase 60: Alloc pass-down SSOT (NO-GO)** - Implemented alloc_passdown_ssot_env_box.h - Modified malloc_tiny_fast.h for SSOT pattern - Result: -0.46% (NO-GO) - Key lesson: SSOT not applicable where early-exit already optimized ## Key Metrics - Performance: 49.13% of mimalloc (M1 effectively achieved) - Stability: CV 1.31% (superior to mimalloc 3.50%) - Syscall budget: 1.25e-7/op (excellent) - RSS: 33MB stable, 0% drift over 60 minutes ## Files Added/Modified New boxes: - core/box/ss_mem_lean_env_box.h - core/box/ss_release_policy_box.{h,c} - core/box/alloc_passdown_ssot_env_box.h Scripts: - scripts/soak_mixed_single_process.sh - scripts/analyze_epoch_tail_csv.py - scripts/soak_mixed_rss.sh - scripts/calculate_percentiles.py - scripts/analyze_soak.py Documentation: Phase 40-60 analysis documents ## Design Decisions 1. Profile separation (core/bench_profile.h): - MIXED_TINYV3_C7_SAFE: Speed-first (no LEAN) - MIXED_TINYV3_C7_BALANCED: Balanced mode (LEAN+OFF) 2. Box Theory compliance: - All ENV gates reversible (HAKMEM_SS_MEM_LEAN, HAKMEM_ALLOC_PASSDOWN_SSOT) - Single conversion points maintained - No physical deletions (compile-out only) 3. Lessons learned: - SSOT effective only where redundancy exists (Phase 60 showed limits) - Branch prediction extremely effective (~0 cycles for well-predicted branches) - Early-exit pattern valuable even when seemingly redundant 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-17 06:24:01 +09:00
# Phase 52: Tail Latency Proxyepoch throughput quantiles
目的: 「alloc/free の tail」を **コード変更なし**で近似し、SSOT 化する。
方針: 単一プロセス soak の **短い epoch** を大量に取り、epoch throughput の分布p50/p90/p99/p999で tail を proxy する。
理由:
- 1-op latency histogram を入れると測定オーバーヘッドが大きい
- 既に epoch 出力(`[EPOCH] ... Throughput ... rss_kb=...`)があるので、低コストで tail proxy が取れる
---
## Step 0: Build
```bash
make bench_random_mixed_hakmem_minimal
make bench_random_mixed_system
make bench_random_mixed_mi
```
---
## Step 1: Single-process epoch soak5分、epoch=1秒
hakmem FAST:
```bash
BENCH_BIN=./bench_random_mixed_hakmem_minimal \
DURATION_SEC=300 EPOCH_SEC=1 WS=400 \
scripts/soak_mixed_single_process.sh > tail_epoch_hakmem_fast_5m.csv
```
mimalloc / system:
```bash
BENCH_BIN=./bench_random_mixed_mi \
DURATION_SEC=300 EPOCH_SEC=1 WS=400 \
scripts/soak_mixed_single_process.sh > tail_epoch_mimalloc_5m.csv
BENCH_BIN=./bench_random_mixed_system \
DURATION_SEC=300 EPOCH_SEC=1 WS=400 \
scripts/soak_mixed_single_process.sh > tail_epoch_system_5m.csv
```
注意:
- `EPOCH_SEC=1` で ~300 サンプルp99 近傍が見える)
- さらに tail を見たい場合は `DURATION_SEC=1800`30分で ~1800 サンプル
---
## Step 2: 集計p50/p90/p99/p999
CSV から分位を計算する。
重要:
- **throughput の tail は “低い側”**p1/p0.1で見るp99 は “速い側”)
- **latency percentiles は per-epoch latency を作ってから計算**する(`p99(latency) ≠ 1/p99(throughput)`
推奨(正しい計算):
```bash
python3 scripts/analyze_epoch_tail_csv.py tail_epoch_hakmem_fast_5m.csv
```
推奨:
- p50/p90/p99 は 5分で十分
- p999 は 30分以上推奨サンプル数が足りない
(分析スクリプトがある場合はそれを使用。なければ簡易 awk/python を追加する Phase 52-1 で行う)
---
## Step 3: SSOT 更新
更新先:
- `docs/analysis/PERFORMANCE_TARGETS_SCORECARD.md`
追記:
- tail proxyp99 epoch throughput / p99 latency proxy
- どの条件FAST/WS/epoch_sec/durationで測ったか