2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
# Current Task: ACE Investigation - Mid-Large Performance Recovery
|
2025-11-05 16:47:04 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
**Date**: 2025-11-08
|
|
|
|
|
**Status**: 🔄 IN PROGRESS
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Priority**: CRITICAL
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## 🎉 Recent Achievements
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
### 100% Stability Fix (Commit 616070cf7)
|
|
|
|
|
- ✅ **50/50 consecutive 4T runs passed**
|
|
|
|
|
- ✅ Bitmap semantics corrected (0xFFFFFFFF = full)
|
|
|
|
|
- ✅ Race condition fixed with mutex protection
|
|
|
|
|
- ✅ User requirement MET: "5%でもクラッシュおこったら使えない" → **0% crash rate**
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
### Comprehensive Benchmark Results (2025-11-08)
|
|
|
|
|
Located at: `benchmarks/results/comprehensive_20251108_214317/`
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Performance Summary:**
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
| Category | HAKMEM | vs System | vs mimalloc | Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|----------|--------|-----------|-------------|--------|
|
|
|
|
|
| **Tiny Hot Path** | 218.65 M/s | **+48.5%** 🏆 | **+23.0%** 🏆 | **HUGE WIN** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Random Mixed 128B | 16.92 M/s | 34% | 28% | Good (+3-4x from Phase 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Random Mixed 256B | 17.59 M/s | 42% | 32% | Good |
|
|
|
|
|
| Random Mixed 512B | 15.61 M/s | 42% | 33% | Good |
|
|
|
|
|
| Random Mixed 2048B | 11.14 M/s | 50% | 65% | Competitive |
|
|
|
|
|
| Random Mixed 4096B | 8.13 M/s | 61% | 66% | Competitive |
|
|
|
|
|
| Larson 1T | 3.92 M/s | 28% | - | Needs work |
|
|
|
|
|
| Larson 4T | 7.55 M/s | 45% | - | Needs work |
|
|
|
|
|
| **Mid-Large MT** | 1.05 M/s | **-88%** 🔴 | **-86%** 🔴 | **CRITICAL ISSUE** |
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Key Findings:**
|
|
|
|
|
1. ✅ **First time beating BOTH System and mimalloc** (Tiny Hot Path)
|
|
|
|
|
2. ✅ **100% stability** - All benchmarks passed without crashes
|
|
|
|
|
3. 🔴 **Critical regression**: Mid-Large MT performance collapsed (-88%)
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Objective: Investigate ACE for Mid-Large Performance Recovery
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Problem:**
|
|
|
|
|
- Mid-Large MT: 1.05M ops/s (was +171% in docs, now -88%)
|
|
|
|
|
- Root cause (from Task Agent report):
|
|
|
|
|
- ACE disabled → all mid allocations go to mmap (slow)
|
|
|
|
|
- This used to be HAKMEM's strength
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Goal:**
|
|
|
|
|
- Understand why ACE is disabled
|
|
|
|
|
- Determine if re-enabling ACE can recover performance
|
|
|
|
|
- If yes, implement ACE enablement
|
|
|
|
|
- If no, find alternative optimization
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Note:** HAKX is legacy code, ignore it. Focus on ACE mechanism.
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Task for Task Agent (Ultrathink Required)
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
### Investigation Scope
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
1. **ACE Current State**
|
|
|
|
|
- Why is ACE disabled?
|
|
|
|
|
- What does ACE do? (Adaptive Cache Engine)
|
|
|
|
|
- How does it help Mid-Large allocations?
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
2. **Code Analysis**
|
|
|
|
|
- Find ACE enablement flags
|
|
|
|
|
- Find ACE initialization code
|
|
|
|
|
- Find ACE allocation path
|
|
|
|
|
- Understand ACE vs mmap decision
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
3. **Root Cause**
|
|
|
|
|
- Why does disabling ACE cause -88% regression?
|
|
|
|
|
- What is the overhead of mmap for every allocation?
|
|
|
|
|
- Can we fix this by re-enabling ACE?
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
4. **Proposed Solution**
|
|
|
|
|
- If ACE can be safely re-enabled: How?
|
|
|
|
|
- If ACE has bugs: What needs fixing?
|
|
|
|
|
- Alternative optimizations if ACE is not viable
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
5. **Implementation Plan**
|
|
|
|
|
- Step-by-step plan to recover Mid-Large performance
|
|
|
|
|
- Estimated effort (days)
|
|
|
|
|
- Risk assessment
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Success Criteria
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
✅ **Understand ACE mechanism and current state**
|
|
|
|
|
✅ **Identify why Mid-Large performance collapsed**
|
|
|
|
|
✅ **Propose concrete solution with implementation plan**
|
|
|
|
|
✅ **Return detailed analysis report**
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Context for Task Agent
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Current Build Flags:**
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
```bash
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
make HEADER_CLASSIDX=1 AGGRESSIVE_INLINE=1 PREWARM_TLS=1
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
```
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Relevant Files to Check:**
|
|
|
|
|
- `core/hakmem_ace*.c` - ACE implementation
|
|
|
|
|
- `core/hakmem_mid_mt.c` - Mid-Large allocator
|
|
|
|
|
- `core/hakmem_learner.c` - Learning mechanism
|
|
|
|
|
- Build flags in Makefile
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Benchmark to Verify:**
|
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
|
|
|
# Mid-Large MT (currently broken)
|
|
|
|
|
./bench_mid_large_mt_hakmem
|
|
|
|
|
# Expected: Should improve significantly with ACE
|
2025-11-08 04:50:41 +09:00
|
|
|
```
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Deliverables
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
1. **ACE Analysis Report** (markdown)
|
|
|
|
|
- ACE mechanism explanation
|
|
|
|
|
- Current state diagnosis
|
|
|
|
|
- Root cause of -88% regression
|
|
|
|
|
- Proposed solution
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
2. **Implementation Plan**
|
|
|
|
|
- Concrete steps to fix
|
|
|
|
|
- Code changes needed
|
|
|
|
|
- Testing strategy
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
3. **Risk Assessment**
|
|
|
|
|
- Stability impact
|
|
|
|
|
- Performance trade-offs
|
|
|
|
|
- Alternative approaches
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
2025-11-08 01:35:45 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
- **Investigation**: Task Agent (Ultrathink mode)
|
|
|
|
|
- **Report Review**: 30 min
|
|
|
|
|
- **Implementation**: 1-2 days (depends on findings)
|
|
|
|
|
- **Validation**: Re-run benchmarks
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
## Notes
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
- Debug logs now properly guarded with `HAKMEM_SUPERSLAB_VERBOSE`
|
|
|
|
|
- Can be enabled with `-DHAKMEM_SUPERSLAB_VERBOSE` for debugging
|
|
|
|
|
- Release builds will be clean (no log spam)
|
2025-11-08 03:18:17 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-08 22:02:09 +09:00
|
|
|
**Status**: Ready to launch Task Agent investigation 🚀
|