2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
// hakmem_bigcache.c - Big-Block Cache Implementation
|
|
|
|
|
// Purpose: Per-site ring cache for large allocations
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
// License: MIT
|
|
|
|
|
// Date: 2025-10-21
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Phase 2c: Dynamic hash table implementation
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "hakmem_bigcache.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "hakmem_internal.h" // Phase 6.15 P0.1: For HAKMEM_LOG macro
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <pthread.h>
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
#include <time.h>
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Data Structures (Phase 2c: Dynamic Hash Table)
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Hash table node (chaining for collision resolution)
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct BigCacheNode {
|
|
|
|
|
void* ptr; // Cached pointer (user pointer, not raw)
|
|
|
|
|
size_t actual_bytes; // Actual allocated size
|
|
|
|
|
size_t class_bytes; // Size class for indexing
|
|
|
|
|
uintptr_t site; // Allocation site
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t timestamp; // Timestamp for LRU eviction
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t access_count; // Hit count for stats
|
|
|
|
|
struct BigCacheNode* next; // Collision chain
|
|
|
|
|
} BigCacheNode;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Dynamic hash table structure
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct BigCacheTable {
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode** buckets; // Dynamic array of bucket heads
|
|
|
|
|
size_t capacity; // Current number of buckets (power of 2)
|
|
|
|
|
size_t count; // Total cached entries
|
|
|
|
|
size_t max_count; // Resize threshold (capacity * LOAD_FACTOR)
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_t lock; // Protect table resizing
|
|
|
|
|
} BigCacheTable;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static BigCacheTable g_bigcache;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Statistics (for debugging/paper)
|
|
|
|
|
static struct {
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t hits;
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t misses;
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t puts;
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t evictions;
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t rejects;
|
|
|
|
|
} g_stats;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int g_initialized = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Helper Functions (Phase 2c: Hash Table Operations)
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Get current timestamp in nanoseconds
|
|
|
|
|
static inline uint64_t get_timestamp_ns(void) {
|
|
|
|
|
struct timespec ts;
|
|
|
|
|
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts);
|
|
|
|
|
return (uint64_t)ts.tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + (uint64_t)ts.tv_nsec;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Phase 2c: Improved hash function (FNV-1a + mixing)
|
|
|
|
|
// Combines size and site_id for better distribution
|
|
|
|
|
static inline size_t bigcache_hash(size_t size, uintptr_t site_id, size_t capacity) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Combine size and site_id
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t hash = size ^ site_id;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FNV-1a mixing
|
|
|
|
|
hash ^= (hash >> 16);
|
|
|
|
|
hash *= 0x85ebca6b;
|
|
|
|
|
hash ^= (hash >> 13);
|
|
|
|
|
hash *= 0xc2b2ae35;
|
|
|
|
|
hash ^= (hash >> 16);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Mask to capacity (assumes power of 2)
|
|
|
|
|
return (size_t)(hash & (capacity - 1));
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if size is cacheable
|
|
|
|
|
static inline int is_cacheable(size_t size) {
|
|
|
|
|
return size >= BIGCACHE_MIN_SIZE;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Callback for actual freeing (set by hakmem.c)
|
|
|
|
|
static void (*g_free_callback)(void* ptr, size_t size) = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Forward declaration for resize
|
|
|
|
|
static void resize_bigcache(void);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Free a cached node (when evicting)
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void free_node(BigCacheNode* node) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (!node) return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Use callback if available to actually free the memory
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
if (g_free_callback) {
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
g_free_callback(node->ptr, node->actual_bytes);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
free(node);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
g_stats.evictions++;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Public API (Phase 2c: Dynamic Hash Table)
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
// ============================================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void hak_bigcache_init(void) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_initialized) return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Initialize hash table
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.capacity = BIGCACHE_INITIAL_CAPACITY;
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.max_count = (size_t)(g_bigcache.capacity * BIGCACHE_LOAD_FACTOR);
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.buckets = (BigCacheNode**)calloc(g_bigcache.capacity, sizeof(BigCacheNode*));
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
if (!g_bigcache.buckets) {
|
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "[BigCache] FATAL: Failed to allocate initial buckets\n");
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_init(&g_bigcache.lock, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Initialize stats
|
|
|
|
|
memset(&g_stats, 0, sizeof(g_stats));
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
g_initialized = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
HAKMEM_LOG("[BigCache] Initialized (Phase 2c: Dynamic hash table)\n");
|
|
|
|
|
HAKMEM_LOG("[BigCache] Initial capacity: %zu buckets, max: %d buckets\n",
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.capacity, BIGCACHE_MAX_CAPACITY);
|
|
|
|
|
HAKMEM_LOG("[BigCache] Load factor: %.2f, min size: %d KB\n",
|
|
|
|
|
BIGCACHE_LOAD_FACTOR, BIGCACHE_MIN_SIZE / 1024);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void hak_bigcache_shutdown(void) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (!g_initialized) return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Free all cached entries
|
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < g_bigcache.capacity; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode* node = g_bigcache.buckets[i];
|
|
|
|
|
while (node) {
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode* next = node->next;
|
|
|
|
|
free_node(node);
|
|
|
|
|
node = next;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Free bucket array
|
|
|
|
|
free(g_bigcache.buckets);
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_destroy(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
hak_bigcache_print_stats();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_initialized = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Phase 2c: Hash table lookup (with collision chaining)
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
int hak_bigcache_try_get(size_t size, uintptr_t site, void** out_ptr) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (!g_initialized) hak_bigcache_init();
|
|
|
|
|
if (!is_cacheable(size)) return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Hash to bucket
|
|
|
|
|
size_t bucket_idx = bigcache_hash(size, site, g_bigcache.capacity);
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode** bucket = &g_bigcache.buckets[bucket_idx];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Search collision chain
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode** prev = bucket;
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode* node = *bucket;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
while (node) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Match by site and sufficient size
|
|
|
|
|
if (node->site == site && node->actual_bytes >= size) {
|
|
|
|
|
// Cache hit!
|
|
|
|
|
*out_ptr = node->ptr;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Remove from chain
|
|
|
|
|
*prev = node->next;
|
|
|
|
|
free(node); // Free node metadata only (not the cached memory)
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.count--;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
g_stats.hits++;
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
prev = &node->next;
|
|
|
|
|
node = node->next;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Cache miss
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
g_stats.misses++;
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Phase 2c: Hash table insertion (with auto-resize)
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
int hak_bigcache_put(void* ptr, size_t actual_bytes, uintptr_t site) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (!g_initialized) hak_bigcache_init();
|
|
|
|
|
if (!is_cacheable(actual_bytes)) {
|
|
|
|
|
g_stats.rejects++;
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Check if resize needed (release lock and acquire write lock)
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_bigcache.count >= g_bigcache.max_count) {
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
resize_bigcache();
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
// Hash to bucket
|
|
|
|
|
size_t bucket_idx = bigcache_hash(actual_bytes, site, g_bigcache.capacity);
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode** bucket = &g_bigcache.buckets[bucket_idx];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create new node
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode* node = (BigCacheNode*)malloc(sizeof(BigCacheNode));
|
|
|
|
|
if (!node) {
|
|
|
|
|
g_stats.rejects++;
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
node->ptr = ptr;
|
|
|
|
|
node->actual_bytes = actual_bytes;
|
|
|
|
|
node->class_bytes = actual_bytes; // For stats
|
|
|
|
|
node->site = site;
|
|
|
|
|
node->timestamp = get_timestamp_ns();
|
|
|
|
|
node->access_count = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Insert at head of chain (most recent)
|
|
|
|
|
node->next = *bucket;
|
|
|
|
|
*bucket = node;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
g_bigcache.count++;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
g_stats.puts++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Phase 2c: Resize hash table (2x capacity)
|
|
|
|
|
static void resize_bigcache(void) {
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
size_t old_capacity = g_bigcache.capacity;
|
|
|
|
|
size_t new_capacity = old_capacity * 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (new_capacity > BIGCACHE_MAX_CAPACITY) {
|
|
|
|
|
new_capacity = BIGCACHE_MAX_CAPACITY;
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
if (new_capacity == old_capacity) {
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
return; // Already at max
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Allocate new bucket array
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode** new_buckets = (BigCacheNode**)calloc(new_capacity, sizeof(BigCacheNode*));
|
|
|
|
|
if (!new_buckets) {
|
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "[BigCache] ERROR: Failed to resize (malloc failed)\n");
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Rehash all entries
|
|
|
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < old_capacity; i++) {
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode* node = g_bigcache.buckets[i];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while (node) {
|
|
|
|
|
BigCacheNode* next = node->next;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Rehash to new bucket
|
|
|
|
|
size_t new_bucket_idx = bigcache_hash(node->actual_bytes, node->site, new_capacity);
|
|
|
|
|
node->next = new_buckets[new_bucket_idx];
|
|
|
|
|
new_buckets[new_bucket_idx] = node;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
node = next;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Replace old buckets
|
|
|
|
|
free(g_bigcache.buckets);
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.buckets = new_buckets;
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.capacity = new_capacity;
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.max_count = (size_t)(new_capacity * BIGCACHE_LOAD_FACTOR);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "[BigCache] Resized: %zu → %zu buckets (%zu entries)\n",
|
|
|
|
|
old_capacity, new_capacity, g_bigcache.count);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&g_bigcache.lock);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void hak_bigcache_print_stats(void) {
|
|
|
|
|
if (!g_initialized) return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("\n========================================\n");
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
printf("BigCache Statistics (Phase 2c: Dynamic)\n");
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
printf("========================================\n");
|
feat: Phase 7 + Phase 2 - Massive performance & stability improvements
Performance Achievements:
- Tiny allocations: +180-280% (21M → 59-70M ops/s random mixed)
- Single-thread: +24% (2.71M → 3.36M ops/s Larson)
- 4T stability: 0% → 95% (19/20 success rate)
- Overall: 91.3% of System malloc average (target was 40-55%) ✓
Phase 7 (Tasks 1-3): Core Optimizations
- Task 1: Header validation removal (Region-ID direct lookup)
- Task 2: Aggressive inline (TLS cache access optimization)
- Task 3: Pre-warm TLS cache (eliminate cold-start penalty)
Result: +180-280% improvement, 85-146% of System malloc
Critical Bug Fixes:
- Fix 64B allocation crash (size-to-class +1 for header)
- Fix 4T wrapper recursion bugs (BUG #7, #8, #10, #11)
- Remove malloc fallback (30% → 50% stability)
Phase 2a: SuperSlab Dynamic Expansion (CRITICAL)
- Implement mimalloc-style chunk linking
- Unlimited slab expansion (no more OOM at 32 slabs)
- Fix chunk initialization bug (bitmap=0x00000001 after expansion)
Files: core/hakmem_tiny_superslab.c/h, core/superslab/superslab_types.h
Result: 50% → 95% stability (19/20 4T success)
Phase 2b: TLS Cache Adaptive Sizing
- Dynamic capacity: 16-2048 slots based on usage
- High-water mark tracking + exponential growth/shrink
- Expected: +3-10% performance, -30-50% memory
Files: core/tiny_adaptive_sizing.c/h (new)
Phase 2c: BigCache Dynamic Hash Table
- Migrate from fixed 256×8 array to dynamic hash table
- Auto-resize: 256 → 512 → 1024 → 65,536 buckets
- Improved hash function (FNV-1a) + collision chaining
Files: core/hakmem_bigcache.c/h
Expected: +10-20% cache hit rate
Design Flaws Analysis:
- Identified 6 components with fixed-capacity bottlenecks
- SuperSlab (CRITICAL), TLS Cache (HIGH), BigCache/L2.5 (MEDIUM)
- Report: DESIGN_FLAWS_ANALYSIS.md (11 chapters)
Documentation:
- 13 comprehensive reports (PHASE*.md, DESIGN_FLAWS*.md)
- Implementation guides, test results, production readiness
- Bug fix reports, root cause analysis
Build System:
- Makefile: phase7 targets, PREWARM_TLS flag
- Auto dependency generation (-MMD -MP) for .inc files
Known Issues:
- 4T stability: 19/20 (95%) - investigating 1 failure for 100%
- L2.5 Pool dynamic sharding: design only (needs 2-3 days integration)
🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-11-08 17:08:00 +09:00
|
|
|
printf("Capacity: %zu buckets\n", g_bigcache.capacity);
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Entries: %zu (%.1f%% load)\n",
|
|
|
|
|
g_bigcache.count,
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 * g_bigcache.count / g_bigcache.capacity);
|
2025-11-05 12:31:14 +09:00
|
|
|
printf("Hits: %lu\n", (unsigned long)g_stats.hits);
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Misses: %lu\n", (unsigned long)g_stats.misses);
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Puts: %lu\n", (unsigned long)g_stats.puts);
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Evictions: %lu\n", (unsigned long)g_stats.evictions);
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Rejects: %lu\n", (unsigned long)g_stats.rejects);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_stats.hits + g_stats.misses > 0) {
|
|
|
|
|
double hit_rate = (double)g_stats.hits / (g_stats.hits + g_stats.misses) * 100.0;
|
|
|
|
|
printf("Hit Rate: %.1f%%\n", hit_rate);
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
printf("========================================\n");
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void hak_bigcache_set_free_callback(hak_bigcache_free_fn_t fn) {
|
|
|
|
|
g_free_callback = fn;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|